There are a few ways modeling is done.
- The success factor modeling by Robert Dilts.
- New code NLP John Grinder.
- The original modeling pre-nlp.
There is also various other models of modeling out there.
Main issue with modeling it requires lot of skill to differentiate between perception and actual fact. For example did someone model Roye Frasers work the generative Imprint and got it all wrong the model they came up with the core transformation process. To badly they didn’t know what they were doing with that modeling and that was people who was there in the start of NLP that did that modeling. So if even those people consider good get it backwards and wrong what chance do anyone else?
Roye Frasers work you find with RBIm 3.0 btw its as core you can get with eliciting yourself, we don’t use it to transform or change anything.
A state of being is different than the process done with NLP and the assumptions of NLP isn’t compatible with the work of Roye Fraser or RBIm 3.0. As stated they don’t understand their own modeling or model and that it cant be applied the way they applied it.
Anyhow that horse is beaten enough.
Modeling is tricky as perceptions will change and filter the result what you come to believe is what you find as a construct. Its why science has so many protocols to check and validate someone else’s work. If someone else can replicate the study of for example penciling, cold fusion, solar power, space engine, etc…then one can say its fairly accurate to say that’s something we can replicate so its not burden with beliefs.
So if I replicate the motion Mike Austin did I can check that by making someone else able to do it or I can check and validate by myself doing it. Then one ahs two sources of check and validation. One can then argue which many does that modeling is to replicate the original result which I find argumently true for many but I found out that isn’t needed anymore to do with the modeling I developed.
Once you have the construction down and able to reverse engineering the process you use yourself to replicate the result then you know what’s going on that created the result. Its easy then to assume we need to allow our own assumptions to set the guidelines here which will most likely corrupt the result and blind us from the truth. That happens fast as the default way people operate in their reality is a process that works to create your reality so the very process itself is then corrupting the end result due to the way you perceive things to happen.
Its why modeling isn’t for everyone as its like theoretical physics only a few does it and fewer might even understand it.
For example I found out how to make sure you can learn to do a 100% uptake of the zone when performing. NLP cant do that for you nor can Mythoself or any other tech out there.
RBIm 3.0 is the first technology in the world to be able to do such.
Its not in the media or in the news as I stated before people don’t understand it and simply I wont publish anything about the how to. If you’re a elite level performer might be golf or tennis or music or whatever else well your welcome to learn it for a price.
Main criteria I use are efficiency and simplicity and its for a reason.
If the model is efficient and simple enough then it has the requisite variety one will need to be able to do something that’s really difficult real easy.
Its then a functional model.
Once one have enough examples of replication the model can be refined and tweaked if needed depending on the result one is after. The current model takes some time to learn as you learn to understand how Intention works and how you can replicate the result in any given field.
It has allowed me to refine the original model the one I used for 18 years into a model which started me to teach and train someone else to replicate the structural format to access the zone to 100% and obviously refine it better so its more efficient and simpler. For that simplicity and its efficiently there is now a price to pay to learn it but then you can start to have your potential in your performance unleashed like no other.
Its magical by science.
I don’t use the format taught in the NLP community as their modeling isn’t good enough. I don’t use the concepts people have in Mythoself or such as it leaves you to do unconscious work which doesn’t exist.
All in all I am happy atm with the modeling I developed and continue to refine.
I taught a early version of this 2001 which was the best course to date in the world.
It has gotten better since.