To attend his wife as she broke her wrists playing tennis. She had to do surgery. Just shows you don’t need to do violent sports to get injured sometimes.
I hope for her speedy recovery and that her ambidextrous practice now is a go.
To attend his wife as she broke her wrists playing tennis. She had to do surgery. Just shows you don’t need to do violent sports to get injured sometimes.
I hope for her speedy recovery and that her ambidextrous practice now is a go.
How do you get good at stuff?
Practice and doing it.
5 years down the intu-.flow path and Palo style of eating. I got good.
The 10000 hours have put a light upon talent and if you have it or not.
I am the expectation to the rule that says you can build and create talent.
Using and utilizing superior strategies.
One such is skill enhancement. I tell Larry to feel the club head vs the ball, vs the mat vs the grass. That he can do. He cant do well what you do is to make the elbow go there and the wrists go there while you then shift your weight there. Its like making birdies in golf, you cant do that better. I told Hans that and he had issues with my logic but I just said, I am right about this I know what I am doing but not what I actually said that you can make a birdie but if its good one, bad one beautiful one is no concern for me or golfers as you cant improve making a birdie.
I made my last post on the website of thedanplan for the next 3 years. I said and predicted 3 years from now he be struggling with his swing mechanics and 5 years from now, he cant play consistently with those mechanics, NONE ON THE TOUR CAN TODAY Why on earth would you then think, I go study with those guys that cant teach it consistently? I understand him though we assume if you play on the tour and use those swings and mechanics that then I should use them also. I tried the internet and failed with it, I tried local lessons and made them work but hit to short and it didn’t make me find out what actually works. I look out there, none of them can do it, consistently all of them search for a way to do it. I divided my skills to do that define it and so I done.
Now there is other swings, like E2E from Jack due to him couldn’t do athletic swings and its a good one if you want short hitting.
I told Dan he can seek me out but he didn’t want to do that, and if you are into getting good you seek anyone out, I search forums, read them, see what people teach, I watch you tube videos, and still its just a mess. How can people fuck up a one piece take away? Annika Sorenstam did it correct but her sister Charlotte teaches it differently and wrong IMO. How bad can it be? Bad.
I have hated bad instruction with NLP, I taught people and when I had questions about NLP they told me I was wrong. I said but dude it doesn’t work the way you guys says it? I was told by an NLP trainer you cant stop doing NLP and hypnosis, and I did. Talk about close minded fields and NLP become one. I am glad that Andy Austin is coming to Sweden with the NLP community here bringing him over a guy I met and traveled to a few years ago we think alike but he decided to write a book without me.
I hate bad instructions and one reason I work to improve mine is that whatever I was taught was called unconscious installation and once I found a way to do it better than bandler I was like, why do it this way he does it? It didn’t make sense to me.
When you search for what works, as I do I sometimes check materials out if they are reasonable priced and offers me things but the ones I bought made me more confused. Chuck tells people what Mike Austin said on his website mentored by the legend, and I cant do what Mike says as its not possible so why even put the video up there if people cant do it dude?
I then think differently the Apple way.
If none can do or teach consistency on the PGA/LPGA tour, why then use their swing systems and teachings?
Answer: None can do it or teach consistency so we use what’s best available for us.
It then becomes like a myth, but tour pros search for when they can do it but just cant. I asked, so how come I cant hit a green from 120 yards? I knew I could do it on the range so I went and study things, then found something, applied it and could do it. Told Hans he hit 16 greens in competition.
The last 3 months my head is on fire, you see me post maybe 3 or more posts a day. This helps me change, the posts here allows me to bring out whatever I am working on. I change daily whatever I taught Hans 3 days ago or Larry a week ago is already different. I changed and evolved.
Its like that for me, once I understand what’s going on, define the model the template then finding a way to teach it that make sense, then improve upon that until its simple. Today I felt something I never felt before, a golf swing.
I then put the club away, took a walk, write this and then go shop.
I tell people I train, work on it, find an aha moment, then stop the practice take time off go do other things. You learn faster and better that way. Hans had issues with this he want to stay there for hours and I say, your done now lets go home and have coffee I am freezing my dick off here.
Dan in thedanplan wont come to me and learn in 3 weeks and 3 months to never need a swing lesson again. He be deadly accurate, longer and have a consistency he never will have now. I think what he does needs encouragement but enough is enough.
When you are about to do things, listening to experts isn’t enough ask, what are the field doing that they cant do today but would like to be able to do?
I found the secret.
Reading golf forums its amazing how many cant play golf and how many asking for advice.
They cant do tempo and as I say so cant the tour pro. If they did they be better. I see people using representational language trying to explain a motion done in less than a second at max speed when your not thinking what your doing. Then they expect they should be able to do it? I see golf teachers trying to make the elbow go one way and then another way and they say do this for 3 weeks and work on that.
It’s a guessing game.
So I went elsewhere to find information that made sense to me.
Feel and pressure points, there is no ground up force in golf that’s a myth. Your power don’t come from the ground. Kelvins research shows that. I then thought seems accurate, I did read teeace write about the Hogan thing, I could replicate that and one guy he had to ban due to the guy argued Hogan didn’t do it that way when you could test it and replicate it so I rather listen to teeace than some guy rambling about Hogan did that or this.
When the Swedish forum was up on golf.se I had Fredrik wetterstrand read my website and he called me a prophet, insulted me and the worst thing? He didn’t understand that himself as I pointed it out to him and he is certified to coach the national team of girls in Sweden??? They had to close down the forum as it got out of hand as people couldn’t argue with stats and facts, I pointed out to them the swede swing model produce back injury, and the failure of elite level golfers is there due to Ballard, and we don’t see much swedes coming up being good as the model they use to produce golfers isn’t good enough.
I found people just argue, guess and such on golf forums mainly. I just read them for funny silly how badly the best teachers is doing things without them even questioning whatever they do.
It’s a way for me to check how well I understand what I found and do myself, if I am able to apply it to figure out what is going on it helps me to develop better ways to teach it. Your better off with feel to find feedback and reference as one your able to do that you will have a golf swing and proper technique without thinking technique at all.
You once did learn language without anything except feedback. You now walk and run without and eat with your own hands all trough feedback. Amazing we can do so many things without an instructor there to teach us.
We can do what the parents to Mikaela Shiffrin did, had fun, did things to improve her ability to adapt and built a world and Olympic champion. They made her cultivate her skills instead of her competing vs others.
Its what I teach Hans and has for a long time.
That I can help him to be better with to build talent.
I am making him focus on the RBIm aspect of building and cultivating skills which been a long road but his tempo is now best in the world so I guess he is accepting that he now should do that with putting and the rest.
Feel you can learn to do that with, technique? You be stuck forever on the golf forums books and videos.
Since I was asked a question about this,
NLP was formed due to modeling 3 people, Fritz Perls and Virginia Satir and then Milton H Erickson they did modeling on other people also along the way they didn’t mention.
The model they found called the Meta-model was from using language to uncover missing information and exclusions and distortions. Once they uncover that they thought they had found the thing. (WOW) They then did study Milton H Erickson and found using specific language to uncover what people said also could be used to also present information within the how people did process information – the inversed meta-model the Milton model.
Using both models the NLP practitioner is made to understand (hopefully) that language and logic have both processes that are inverse to one another and recursive to its nature.
Now, whatever NLP when it was formed it was about finding excellence modeling patterns of such and then use in the model called NLP. It means NLP was made to update it self once better models and patterns was found.
RBIm is a better updated NLP model.
Its NLP in its core and essence distill down with newer models and patterns.
I defiend the variable that makes NLP to always work, and since no one in NLP knows about it then they need to learn it from me. I know something Richard Bandler does not about NLP and he needs to come see me to learn it.
The golf swing I have is a composite or hybrid model. I wanted to do two things, capture the Mike Austin swing motion (done) and to find about how to create consistency in the golf field. (also done).
What sometimes confuse people is the update of the model, Hans tells me, new again? I go yes do this now. He then tells me, but this is better? yes I know, I say.
I changed the set up that Mike never used to simplify the golf swing and mechanics. Hans changed it and said, dude this is great. I said, thanks.
I changed the down swing teachings to be more reference and feedback based as people had to much confusion about technique and lacked feedback to reference when they learn this so I found better ways to do that and made videos to Larry.
The golf swing model I have is, the Mike Austin swing motion. Full stop there, its the baseline. How you go about to learn it is much different than what he Mike told people and taught and how others teach the Mike Austin swing system.
Modeling means distill down the essence of excellence, the result someone achieves.
In this case the motion pattern Mike Austin did do.
Once I was done, Hans was able to do it, then I spent soon 3 months to improve this to define the model into its essence then teach it to make better ways to do it and learn to do. It means you spend some time to learn things none teaches you to do here. You learn the set up feel difference which then is the reference to the feedback at impact and the motion to achieve such is the pivot. You then start to organize to the set up and back swing, which then with transition is referenced to the impact position definition.
When I do things like this, I define what is going on and once defined, I just do what the model instructs me to do I don’t think what did Mike do or what do others do in the Mike Austin swing system, I re-define and have defined the golf swing like none you seen before. What people then do as what I do is so new is they cant understand what it is and what I do, the way NLP came to life was new also they had results like none ever seen in the field of therapy before. They had students doing a month long NLP training and then they could do miracle work with clients just like Milton could but without 50 years of training and experience. People in psychology cant do what my students are able to do. I can send a nutcase to them and they be able to do things none in the therapy field is able to do with them.
Its called excellence.
I reference it as Legendary Awesomeness.
If you have a bunch of people learn genius things, excellence beyond what people are used to learn and enough people learn it then those genius things become normal and standard. That is what its like for me as I spent 20+ years pursuing things like Modeling to define modeling and to do it and then one day be able to teach it so we can have more people creating awesomeness and legendary so out there to make the planet a tiny bit better before someone blows it up for us.
Many become confused between what I did, model the motion Mike Austin did do, vs what he taught. Hans here is doing the motion,
Mike Dunaway here is NOT.
I have no problem or issue with either Mike Austin or Mike Dunaway as what I done captures the motion, my modeling is then done. What it means is what it means. It means Mike Austin didn’t understand his own golf motion. It also means he couldn’t teach it the way he did it. It don’t mean Mike Dunaway cant hit it long, plenty of distance but the same motion? no.
Milton when John Grinder did model him understood this well, so did Gregory Bateson they both understood the greatness that was created called NLP but that technology has become mainstream now and stagnated. NLP was a holding place for better models and updates along the way but something went wrong. NLP was replaced with money and power.
It wasn’t then about the excellence and
updating its own core models and patterns.
Hans have had access to what I do for years and I just tell him to do things that works. He didn’t do the grip change as he got hurt doing so he just opened the blade instead. Still he needed to do that change.
It wont mean when you do the modeling what you end up looks “exactly” like the original role-model did do it. I improved the set up address position so its better than what Mike Austin did do and taught. Its easier, faster more efficient and suits how the body mechanically moves and whenever someone tells me Mike did understand body better than anyone I would ask why he didn’t find what I am doing then which is better.
Just because a role-model is able to do things they often lack any insight in how they actually does things due to them lack models to capture things they are not even aware off. I don’t explain how I do things I just cant its to hard for me.
I know what I do is simple to me and so easy and while I know I can do it that way what I am able to do that makes it so simple and easy I cant explain nor explain.
I told Hans yesterday whatever I am doing I cant value it as I have to look to what people do in golf to check out what they do to get an idea how good this is. I cant ask anyone as they don’t understand me as golf trainers and instructors.
I am the RBImGuy I make people better and what they do better.
I just do what I do.
The model I capture is called a template it means I then when I teach it adjust and tweak whatever someone is doing when they swing until they match the motion pattern I defined. There is no standard teaching here, this is all done with feedback and reference. I follow my template, if the student don’t match it, then I adjust until they do, and I cant tell them technique as this isn’t done trough technique. Once they are done they have technique.
It’s organizing differently to whatever you want to do. My interest are, NLP and golf swing and consistency recently. I then apply what I do to find out how the golf swing works and how to capture consistency as none been able to define it in golf ever.
Beyond what I tell you that is beyond what people even can believe is true as none have done it before so what then how can you then value what I do when I think its easy and simple with that? I ask Hans, so do you hit over the pin in your approaches? yes, last time I hit one pin and one almost, ok once you hit 3 in a row you can go home your then done for the day. (hitting pins is not good) It moves the ball to far off the flag more often than not.
Hans? He still expect to hit it elsewhere. He never been able to hit it like this, straight then the same again and then again. I didn’t model that from Mike Austin that is from RBIm. He is trying to wrap his head around that he is the guy doing it atm.
You want the best?
Can you handle it then?
Krishnamurti once went around asking gurus in India about enlightenment and asked them to be taught to be enlighten, as he went around visiting all these gurus, one such looked at him when he asked that question, are you ready for it?
RBIm is taking the guessing out of the game you use a template to produce the result then it will always 100% work. Naturally if your not able to follow and use the template to such extent then you wont reach the result either.
Hans match the Mike Austin motion he Mike did use when he swung, my modeling then is done and done. None is able to explain that from the Mike Austin camp, none. Please go ask them.
What I am doing with Hans isn’t about Mike Austin its about playing better golf, to hit the ball where you want it without guessing, to have a consistency none have had since the days of Moe Norman and to handle that is though as if you never been able to and guessed you lacked talent or such and then is able to do it then it will question the very core of your existence.
My field of expertise.
Welcome to RBIm the FutureNow.
People build assumptions in how things work, until Einstein came along people believed the world was a clock, until flosbury came along everybody jumped high jump one way and until Boklöv came along ski jumping changed over night.
Exceptions to the rules.
I don’t talk about talent if you have it or not, I create talent. If you have the ambition and desire, I take you there where you want to go.
Superior strategy allows you to reverse engineer what people do that create results it doesn’t mean it will be whatever they told you it was. One reason in don’t tell you about what I do, as its complicated to me. Want to learn to do what I do? Ask someone else as I cant say.
I learned to do what do due out of pure interest and found love with NLP.
For me, RBIm is NLP and nothing else.
Its just a different name with updating models and patterns excellence updating themselves.
He is a bit stressed atm, he had much around him, kids, school and job and not forget the golf.
He is happy though, and he had a lesson with a 80 year old guy who builds clubs for him, the guy has issues with his instruction as they change every week. Hans said, well I had 3 swings this week as my coach change his mind every day.
As long I have new findings those gets into the teaching and instruction. The last bit however I added make it all fit together much better.
Hope to have video the next few days as spring is coming to south Sweden.
Its however not as bad as normally this time I would have more snow, a week of heat and most be gone and I bet range opens earlier than ever and hopefully the courses also.
Kelvin from Hawaii does study of what tour pros does. I don’t. Its good he does it so we can study micro movements and what they do with their bodies. Naturally I ask, is those guys the best models? They have issues with timing and consistency right?
So I ask, can we study others that don’t have such issues?
Annika Sorenstam was dominant player she won 72 times, her sister one. I then look into what she did not what her swing was like. Yes she had a swing that was tempo wise really good and the main reason she won so much. Now with modeling we look for excellence those that have superb result like, Annika, like Tiger woods, like Jack Nicklaus, like Moe Norman and Mike Austin. I pick criteria like, hit it long, well Mike Austin become the model there, then consistency well Moe Norman and Ben Hogan much more than Mike Austin for sure. Models I pick are picked due to them are able to do things that others cant do, they excel at what they do.
Study a field of people playing golf you need to find good examples and as I look at tour level golf I see, inconsistency not able to do good golf 4 days in a row, struggling and hitting left and right and all other kinds of things.
I look at the baseline as I looked at Mike Austin I saw, ok what he is doing vs what he taught, don’t match. Now some got upset with that but I do modeling I don’t care about what people think all I do care about, there is a difference so, why is there a difference then?
When John Grinder model Milton H Erickson and coded what he did, what he ended up with was a model that allowed people to become as skilled as Milton without traditional hypnosis training. It means they couldn’t just do hypnosis but achieve similar miracle result Milton had when he had 50 years of experience in the field.
I look at Kelvins research as it helps me understand tour pro golf. It helps me understand the swing from difference and it helps me understand body motions and it helps me define consistency.
The result I look for
are based upon finding consistency to happen in playing golf.
It don’t mean I think golf swing mechanics is needed, but feel is. All tour pros have feel of impact. I then devised how to gain that.
Consistency playing golf no tour pro can do.
I thought if they cant do that, then I wont study them as they are not good enough.
I then taught Hans this model and he can do consistency on a beat with perfect tempo. It helps him swing being more accurate and has organized his motion into a flowing action.
Choosing a model is as important as to find one that works for your purpose. Its not random, I look for excellence of the things I want to do. Consistency, distance and simplicity guides me for golf. I then naturally have to find better ways to explain what to do, to create better feedback as that I already know how it works and once you have a model and template to follow, its just feedback to follow it. Tweaking at this point is to find better explanations, simplify the feedback and build proper reference to why you do things the way you do it in the golf swing of RBIm.
I have evidence to check for, the question when I teach is, how long does it take as the feedback I gather about time is the evidence there. Hans is easy mainly due to him already had impact working. Then devise the amateur as well as me to do that first. I didn’t do that first the last few weeks but now have revised what I do to include that also. Without that the feedback is to hard to track and reference for the individual. Larry been great here to help me improve what I do and teach with the golf swing mechanics.
I already improved the teaching and the feedback and the evidence and feel and have better references now to teach.
I model Moe Norman due to him was the best ball striker. Hans can do that what Moe did. Had nothing to do with grip or stance btw. I then apply that and then add the motion from Austin, then impact and release from both Austin and Moe as they both used similar ones.
That didn’t solve the feedback with impact though as I looked elsewhere for that, thanks to Google I have previously found such source. Adding that things now looks really good for this.
Dilts talks Milton.
Did read the talent code book?
It’s a good read even though I don’t agree on the conclusions he Doyle made.
Hotbeds of talent happens due to the individual is doing more mistakes per time spent. Not doing more things right in the time spent. Its easy to assume to do deep or deliberate practice is to do it right but it isn’t. Each practice I do I seldom if ever make it right.
I swing more wrong than right.
The NOTNLP protocol, what is there and what is not there allows the individual to elicit a working stable experience by definition of what is there and what is not there, (its Nobel prize level btw) both are actually there as human brains can do things that don’t exist. No there is no mystical force at play its what we do we can think outside the context of other time and places.
We can then create a scenario of things that have not happen.
Recently I had 2 months soon 3 of intense golf research discovery burst. Between September and December I didn’t even think about golf. It was the incubation time where everything I done was cooking. Once out you seen a ton of posts about golf and its all due to me getting it all out of my head.
The golf swing of RBIm is a composite model, a hybrid if you like. It has elements of Moe Norman, it has an austinique motion, it has things from Darren as this is about creating reference so you understand what to practice to make it work. I had to build all those into a working practice that you once known can create a better feedback foundation.
I know one thing once that feedback reference is found your swing improvement will be better in minutes, hours or days. However to find those is as much research and check out there to find those small bits that works. Then to find out why they work, to then streamline them down.
So the swing model is done now its improvement in the teaching it, to find better ways to explain and what to practice with feel and evidence. The good thing is I am going trough the same process.
Even if I know what to do, and how this works, it wont mean I can do it. I can teach it for sure but that don’t help me. I also need to find easier, more efficient ways to create reference as once I do, improvement is easy.
I understand that imperfect practice is what makes you isolate and do what works. The same principle is in that notnlp protocol also. All we do is to refine the motion until we know it works for us and to do that we need feedback with the proper things referenced for us.
Golf instruction today have no such practice. Its why they get worse and worse instead of better and better. Its why they need to fix their swing once or twice a week and cant just go and play.
When I am done, no more fixing needed it will just work.
I changed my set up from Moe, makes it easier to do. I swing with a pivot from Austin and I get to Impact thanks to Darren.
Good 3 months.
Mike Austin mechanics I have improved upon. They are now done easier and better. Still wont help me until I am able to do it myself as knowing what to do and able to do it is for me a period of research to find better feedback models to use.
Now I know when I look at a video of myself swing, I know what to change to make it better.
I build a swing with feel. There is as little technique talk I can manage. Naturally you need evidence that your doing things right.
I had now 2 days from the day I hit balls indoor, then at home improving things and then one more thing happen, its funny as I thought about something I wrote about a long time ago about the golf swing, so I went back to the guy I study then. Naturally this make more sense now and I started to incorporate that into the model of the golf swing here.
Then the hammer dropped on my head, but OH that make total sense now!
No wonder I had issues with this earlier, and now this allowed me to formulate an even easier reference for the practice to use to find out what the body should do and move. Improved my down swing directly and any attempt to do a OTT move (over the top) couldn’t happen and I made it go where things should go.
Now this again shows how things happen, model is done now its a question to teach things as efficient as possible and as easy and simple.
I built new reference as you need that to have feedback to what to do.
if you know that you can improve in minutes with something you done wrong your whole life. Its one thing I do sometimes with dyslexics, I know what they need to have to make it work, some of them have it all but just badly organized, fixing that allows them to become like your or me overnight. For them and their parents its like magic.
I know once I do things that if I struggle to get across a concept I need a better teaching instruction. One of the things I looked into was naturally the set up and I changed that as I looked into Moe, told Hans and he said, dude this is easier and better, so he changed it in minutes. I then as I looked into the down swing also checked out impact, to get there and make that happen as most amateurs have no clue if they hit the ball, mat, or grass or fat or thin so with better feedback we can make that happen and improve faster. I told Hans this also should make him hit it a bit longer also.
So I test it, it feels better, easier reference, evidence shows a better motion. cool.
I just wish it was easier to teach oneself. But whatever I use the same things I do with Larry, Hans and others for myself. I set myself up statically, impact there, and new desired one, set tempo for pelvis movement and sync kinetic chain, cool and then ok why cant that happen so my brain goes searching and an answer then comes up but what about that thing before? I did that initially with Larry the last time a bit.
But now I also understand the reference for feedback better and adding that forces faster feedback and improved action. Typical I need to go indoors to test this vs go outside on range. Might need to go indoors tomorrow then.
Feel+ evidence with reference for feedback. Respond to pressure and force.
Hans made a change in his own. Without asking me…. Black hat old. New blue hat. and no its not the hat…….he changed..its something else.
The last image is Monte a world champion 20 years ago in long driving demo a tilt is needed at impact but he also use a strained scapula/shoulder and a hold off release with rotational pelvis movement.
Timing needed for Monte to get it right, one in every 3 to 5 attempts or so.
Timing needed for Hans? Without the strain he does it 9 out of ten times maybe 10 out of ten.
if your going to play tour level golf you want consistency which means ball striking ability to make the ball go the same path and trajectory every time. Even if you match trackman every time as many swedes are trying to do they still cant hit the shots they want consistently.
It’s the main difference between a rotational pelvis vs one you don’t rotate.
The main reason is a lack of reference for feedback while you swing. I built Hans such a reference with RBIm and he just hit the ball the same tempo with that increasing margin for error which allows him to play differently out there now.
Monte has to hold off his release while Hans can just release. One has less timing vs the other one. Cant change mechanics and complicated and hard with timing. A free release allows easier timing, better tempo and better consistency the trademark of Hogan and Moe.
Its exceptions like the flosbury flop. Its easier to do it wont mean your suddenly 15 shots better but at least you can play without being concerned with timing will work or not in that swing.