The RBIM tool can be applied in several ways, directly elicit a desired future experience contain within a context or solving problems.
I learned by testing that whatever Joseph Riggio talked about was bullshit. It didn’t work the way he taught and spoke about that stuff with Mythoself.
We map what we call the old SSG the way you sustain current limitation by start and end points of contexts. That allows the individual to set it aside and reference it for the choice we want to have what to choose. Once the old SSG is mapped we then establish the new SSG.
Social phobia with people we use “I already know the people I am going to meet and talk to” as a result achieved with the new SSG.
The new SSG cant be related to the old SSG like, “I want to be confident” in the new SSG wont work due to its based upon referencing the old problem the old SSG.
We create a separation between old and new so we can choose which one to do.
You do the same with habits, and other limitations.
Map the old start and point and set aside.
Define the new SSG.
I was approached in Mohonk and the stuff I did run at the time was the notnlp protocol that worked flawlessly in Canada the weekend before. In Mohonk with the Mythoself people it hit the ground and I didn’t know why but later understood those guys all believed in the unconscious mind including Joseph Riggio. I had a guy walk up to me and ask stuff and he said I am committed to the Mythoself and he told me and I sat there listening but he said he couldn’t do it. I smiled and said, you seem disconnected from the experience, he sat there for 30 seconds still and said, oh where did that belief come from and thanked me and walked off. Now, I had to ask myself why is he asking me and not the guy who created and developed Mythoself? He in my guess already did and couldn’t do it.
RBIM allows you to do Mythoself easier than ever before, map the start point of your life and when that whatever that has been to date and then set that aside and start to ask what’s your future self is contained within such context.
Mind blown right?
No need for story telling, no need to do hypnosis and I break it down into a single choice to choose from. That’s power.
Your brain run constructed concepts we call them assumptions that are derived from contexts so called facts people use to stay sane in the world. What was previously assumed that you had an unconscious mind that made stuff for you like decisions but here is the thing once you change the source of the assumption your reality is changed along the way you now perceive the world differently but still the same.
Normally people try to change the problem etc..
with a reference to the problem within the problem itself like:
social phobia then needs a solution a fix with “Need confidence” which wont work as its based upon the assumption the social phobia needs confidence to not be a problem anymore which never works.
Any change, transformation, transcendence etc…is always done trough a replacement of facts the underlying contextual containment of assumptions.
For example Richard Bandler have for 40 or so years not been able to understand this and cant teach people what he is actually doing that works to create change and it has nothing to do with submodalites or the VAK patterns. The issue with the unconscious mind concept an archaic relic from Freud which Paul Bjerre told him due to Bjerre had better results and he understood that whatever they taught wasn’t accurate there either.
Your brain use neural nets which means a flexible network drawing from multiple sources like for example an image in your mind is constructed from 5 different centers for the visual reference alone, 5! and then you have several more centers also included in one single image. Its all a composite into a single coherent understanding that this is an orange or an apple.
Knowing that it’s a concept and multiple sources used wont help you change the phobia or the social anxiety or the habits. Trusting the unconscious mind guesswork using hypnosis etc..takes time and isn’t efficient.
RBIM 4 allows one to map the contextual containment the neural net sources use to create the understanding used. Once we replace the old contextual containment, the system have now a new source of facts to draw from and then your reality is new.
You don’t need an anchored resource like they do in NLP or collapse anchors as they do in NLP as every pattern there is built from the idea that its sensory data that makes the change happen and it simply isn’t. It just seems like it is.
Had a student, he said he had a height phobia, so I asked him about it and then told him after 30 seconds, you’re here in this town in a classroom with other people, he snapped out out of the phobia and it now was gone. He could not believe it. He later traveled back where he got the phobia and tried to find out if it was still there and it still was not. Some people cant believe what I do did work when it did work.
Its due to what people like yourself already believe about how change happens. Why are everyone trying to change the problem within its own containment? Its like walking into a cage with a lion expecting the lion to sit down and purr? That wont work. The containment of the same context your reality of the problem is then limited in its choices and decisions you simply have a moment 22 going on.
When a trauma is established the system contain it and try to fix it by moving you into a new SSG but that’s isn’t working due to the new SSG is contained within the old SSG your now nested within the same old SSG and then when fixing the additional SSG your now faced with the trauma and that the brain is trying to protect so fixing the additional SSG then will meet resistance from you.
Why the brain does that? It cant separate between real or fake or imagined or real events anyhow.
I was having a client calling me 12 years ago and I was then at the time running down the soon to be discovered future NOTNLP protocol with her, as she after a while told me she had her desired experience she also said to me, that her sexual abuse was the reason for the issue she had in her case driving across bridges but here is the kicker, we never worked on the sexual abuse as she didn’t know it was even there. She had no idea about that as her brain had managed to create new additions new SSG within the old SSG but once we run the NOTNLP protocol for her future experience the old one vanished by itself (the sexual abuse) and she was fine about it. I knew then when I put down the phone that this what just did happen was not doable with NLP or Mythoself or anything else I come across.
I had just discovered the NOTNLP comparison mode.
Her old trauma was now gone and she was totally fine with her new found reality.
BUT we never worked with the trauma at all so what did happen?
The comparison mode today are called the RBIM 4 with SSG.
The same process that allowed her to release the trauma is now used to fix limitations and problems the same way by replacing the contextual containment what we call with RBIm 4 SSG or self sustained generalizations.
You can work with single habits, phobias, anxiety, worry, or learning new languages or fixing traumas or replacing the whole identity your self in one single choice.
This all did happen as I was wondering why I was able to create results that NLP practitioners and the like couldn’t. Once the comparison mode was found and mapped out this allowed me to reconfigure and reinvent the way change does happen so you can directly work with the source of change replacing the context the containment source.
RBIm 4 works by definition to create the distinction between the old and the new SSG. The comparison mode is then engaged properly and you can then choose what containment and context you want to run for your life.
RBIm 4 use the same approach for whatever change you do or solution or transformation or transcendence as its how the brain already does changes to create reality for you.
If the old or current assumptions are not mapped and addressed the future experience wont happen. You might be able to have a future experience but what typically will happen is that the system reverse back. In Mythoself this is addressed by anchoring by the limit the limitation pattern and then fire off the desired resource. Its taught differently with NLP but the system they do there are based upon VAK and submodality and language patterns without really understanding what’s going on.
Once you map the problem with RBIm 4 then you can reference it due to defining it allows a new SSG to be built free and separate from the old one. We then wont need to work with the old SSG and can focus solely to establish the new found result we want to have and then choose when that’s done which one to run.
In the above example with social phobias; Social phobia with people we use “I already know the people I am going to meet and talk to” as a result achieved with the new SSG.
If everyone you meet, strangers, friends, family, co-workers etc…are people you already know then your able to be fine and confident and what else without fixing the social phobia at all. Its then gone.
That’s one of the possible ways we can work with the RBIm 4 tool.
The skype chat with RBIm 4 in action here.