SSG, beliefs and projections

One could say that people are living their life from a standpoint of imagination. That what we think is real never is. Maybe that’s to much for you to believe in but truth and facts don’t lie, humans do. When the truth or fact isn’t a good one to support our argument or belief its ignored, blatantly accused to be wrong and whatever else.

We project information which isn’t a new idea or such but the way we do it wont be explained until you understand how contextual forms interact with your way of experiencing life.

RBIm call such SSG or self sustained generalizations.
You create your own reality and sustain it.

Projections are filtering effects we have in the way of reality. Depending on how much this is ingrained in the individual or group we can meet a high level of resistance when we introduce the idea of projections.

Maybe you heard about that an idea is first rejected, then slowly thought as silly and at some point its just accepted as is. The way perception works is that whenever we meet information we are not really seeing people and information and while we do see information it’s a constructed reality combined from how our brain functions and our eyes are designed. What we perceive is our habit or generalized notion of what to see.

You see a black man and think, lazy bastard. You see a police in USA and think, is he going to shoot me? You see a white man and thinks does he support Donald Trump? You see a catholic priest and think, does he rape kids?

To be in the moment to perceive as far we can without passing judgment which we don’t really do directly but more indirectly due to how the SSG is already set up for you. If we try to change then we are working within the system the way NLP works and suggest you to work.

But NLP does not work.

I know so after working with it for a couple of decades that whatever they stated is wrong as the technology of NLP cant work to change the way they said it would work to change.

To make any change or transformation have to utilize the same principle’s that are present with RBIm.

No way around that.

Whatever you perceive has already been run trough a construction set, an SSG and that then becomes your habits and behaviors expressed before you even consider or think why you even think or do things the way you do. Once we re-set and establish a new SSG the system can either work directly with the new or it can take time and the difference are due to how much filtering is going on how many layers are there to be able to define the current outcome we wanted to experience.

There is a difference between the visual and the vestibular system for example as both systems can track moving information both in space and internally at some time those systems interact differently its then you see a train move while it does not as you gain two set of information one visual and one vestibular. When there is no conflicting scheduling it all works seamlessly for us but when the systems becomes scheduled to provide information at the same time differently then we can experience a duality of the wrong things happening for us.

A golfer can believe he is suppose to feel strain and muscle it when he should feel it to be effortless and efficient instead, his beliefs and assumption what to experience will override the actual reality and fact and depending on how many layers he may never know the truth what to do. Many fight this in golf and some never overcome this at all and will struggle forever.

In other areas people might believe that to be happy they need a new car or a house or a child. That the external thing and objects somehow makes someone happy is a common assumption.

If you enjoy things you do, your always happy.

I enjoy writing blog posts, makes me happy for sure to do them and I look forward to do them.

People that are depressed don’t enjoy anything.


Their layering and projection from that is layered thick.

The idea is really simple with RBIm we simply put ask people to define and compare whatever they perceive vs what’s out there.

The golfer is told to that effortless efficient felt is the correct way to do it due to the assumption what to feel and experience while swinging muscle and with strain that way is wrong and once tested the individual accept the new. The brain does the new without changing the old.

The depressed can be focused on things they can enjoy and whatever it might be is introduced and defined and once the individual can do that they are not depressed anymore. No change happening as the system adapts and builds new.

Change and unconscious minds does not exist.

Contextual forms does as it allows the brain to sync and define various input into a contained of projection to be expressed by the individual or group.

Once you set up to meet and talk to strangers and your comfortable to do so at some point you can choose to meet and talk to anyone that way even if you never met them or talk their language.

The RBIm way the future new

SSG and beliefs the world of power

SSG or self sustaining generalization are a way to contain information into contextual forms. SSG contains a start point and a end point. Its due to the brain is constantly projecting information for you whatever happens right now your brain wants to project to the future actions you are about to do.

So the SSG stops the projection of the future and then make you manage the problem.

RBIm 5 and 6 focus onto building upon the future based upon what you can do.

Beliefs are projections you have “Opinions” about yourself and life.
None of them are real.

Beliefs are a loose concept as they are tangible to faith for example which means there is no evidence or proof in the way so the individual can create any truth to the statement of faith. There is no contraindication for the believer in faith. It’s a internal created imagination without hindrance.

Beliefs can also be convincing convictions which is also the same as Faith due to you can be absolutely convinced you hate chocolate ice cream until you by some accident tried it out and found it was the best thing ever. Convictions are supported by your own evidence what you come to assume is true.

Wait a second do you mean no one are having any truth what so ever?


We are constantly lying to ourselves all the time.

Once you understand whatever anyone tells you, friend, family, boss, customer, foreigner all that expressed is their opinion about stuff which isn’t true at all. Then your able to understand that’s a statement of their internal world their beliefs, culturally and socially and that they have no bearing on you or your life.

RBIm clarifies that a useable format as the SSG allows the individual to sort information they believe into manageable formats a contextual form that allows them to stop the future projection you have. That allows you to be moving towards a measurable way to go about skills, life experiences that isn’t wishful thinking but manageable units that exist and steams from contextual forms allowing you a new way to project yourself.

The paradox here for most people is that if we are being lied to all the time do we also lie to ourselves and that’s a yes also.

When faced with a contradiction like the example I gave here on Facebook,

RBIm suggest to make people to focus on what they can do and then form their SSG from that which means measure and compare.
Beliefs are basically opinions you have about the world.
I believe in God, (Opinion)
I believe its right to fuck small kids as they love me (Opinions)
I believe I am lucky, etc….all Opinions.
People then tend to forget that is all that is really and then start to act upon them,
Students protest and burn flags, or abortion is a evil devilish thing, no its just your opinion about that subject.
However you feel justified when you act upon your opinions due to your view its wrong to do abortion often supported by a Christian belief or about life and death and choice, the foster has no saying etc…so people feel justified to do things and act upon them as it feels right to do so.
However, after that you killed a few people and realize what you did you now value your belief in contradiction that its right to protest against abortion and then you killed a few doing so and many then actually forms a value proposition to that it was justified to do so and then they can keep their belief (opinion) while that means they just established a double-bind paradox, they protest against abortion killing fosters is bad and wrong but killing people to make their point about abortion is justified.
That’s called a double bind and is very common with nutty people.
You also find them with what you call normal people but when that bind is going on they are not normal.


Double binds are beliefs that falls back to themselves without being resolved. Your damned if you do and damned if you don’t. To resolve them we create an SSG.

The double bind cant be resolved within the environment/context it is active and works within as NLP teaches people to deal with them but the only way to make that work is to work as we do with RBIm and SSG. My client work and experience was to create SSG format for people and while I was working like that there was no NLP that taught that and something I formalized from my own work.

I knew it wasn’t NLP and the way NLP worked but I didn’t have a concept for it until SSG and RBIm.

Improving life the RBIm Way

Science is a big thing for me as facts is fun.

Article here

key is to craft a statement that’s inspirational, but still one you believe you can do

The way the brain works we want to keep it down to what we can do.

Brains are simple things in that as you can create anything imagined in your head, travel to the end of the known Universe or into a black hole? Done and done. That’s easy to do in your head.

Making it real working to make it work is not easy doing it the way people try to do things by making lofty goals, I will win or such statements.

Keeping it down to what you can do, adding some inspirational allows you to improve over time.

That’s the RBIm way.

If you try using a lofty goal that has no relevance to your current level it wont work.

However building it upon what you can do creates magic.

John Wodden used it to create a team that was unbeatable pretty much for a decade.

A month later or so.

Each step of the way one can ask, how fast can change happen or how fast can learning and improvement happen?

I don’t talk change as I tend to say its about learning and improvement to build new.

It wont matter if its about a golf swing or if its about language or a business plan or health or dyslexia or whatever else.

Where are you going – your destination?
Establish the definition there sets the direction.
SSG with RBIm4

For my golf swing its improving into the template so each session I work on one thing until I can do that. I don’t do 10 things or 5 maybe 2 but that’s seldom as its normally just one. At some point one can measure the improvement as if you can do that your attending feedback as you do.

Measurement of the behavior is the path to improvement.

RBIm allows you to start doing that to be able to correlate what actually happens in the world vs what you perceive it to be.

At some point when I improve I might find that I am not able to do things and then I stop and either apply the proper action or I have to test a few variables to find out what works to establish the intended destination.

Yesterday it become obvious, ok need to fix my pivot now. I didn’t had a thought or plan to do that but it all was obvious as once one follow a template we work one step at the time until that works and when it works we move on to the next thing in the list.

I also work trough the instruction set as it means it takes a bit longer as I am also mapping the system along the way. Old work habit. Doing so means I can understand this differently as I measure along the way what’s going on.

Where are you going?

Measure current progress.
Evidence with behavior (SSG)

Take note of improvement.

If no improvement in a reasonable timeframe check the evidence feedback.


RBim6 self sustained improvement

Oli asked what’s the difference between rbim 4 and 5 and I was like, have to look it up as I don’t keep track on what version does what, I use Google for that normally.

The RBIm3 has self, the RBIm4 was about the SSG self sustaining Generalizations and RBI5 is improvement.

So RBIm6 is self sustained improvement all building upon the 3 previous alterations. Each iteration of RBIm covers an aspect of research.

If someone came along and said, do you want to be immortal anyone would likely say yes, however at some point the stars burns out and the Universe goes cold and what are you going to do then?

To be better as a human being takes time, practice and wont be a fast road to success normally.

Its easier when one consider to be a little bit better but then you need to master your attention and focus span. Since context and memory is always an issue one would need to understand that change is a false positive as there is no such thing. Your memory works by accessing the last time you recalled something. so whatever you just do remember you remember the last time you remember what you remember about.

You recall an event, a dog that was growling, as I was 4 years old and our dog was bullied by neighbors kids, as he had a bone and I approached, I stopped and waited and then asked for the bone, as the dog consider me and the task, he stopped growling and gave me the bone. I looked at the dog, smiled and gave him the bone back.

So basically I recall the last time I remember that moment and I was 4 years old.

For me however it does not seem as I am doing just that but knowing how this works one can understand that the recalling then is about the context involved and how one approaches the same environment.

For example, as Hans putt the new way as he said, I make everything on the practice green but going on out playing, isn’t as easy. He has the proper reference before he steps upon the green and then he changed. His brain is recalling the way he thinks he suppose to do this the old way which isn’t as good. The reflex here is the brain goes, step upon a green playing is a different context than the practice green.

Then the result will be different how much he wants he cant change his brain to do differently.

So I run him trough a definition of what he is suppose to do, accessing the way it works on the practice green and then map it over? No that’s NLP and wont work so good and it sucks btw using.

I redefine what the putting are supposedly to be on the course playing. For Hans his attention and focus changes and he is stuck with the old way due to he didn’t focus on what he is suppose to experience when he goes upon the green there as if he did he then could improve.

If he don’t, he cant improve.

Once defined what to experience, you track that no matter what happens as the system then has to re-organize accordingly to the new defined focus of attention.

Now, you can improve trough feedback as you can feel the difference.

I run my template and each time I do I might reference something new to fix the old ways, either it be posture, or the back swing or the transition or whatever else. Once I do when I go practice I do really badly at first, last time I did this a few days ago it took me 8 balls hitting on the backyard until the system had reacted and improved.

For someone new, doing this creates problems normally, first they don’t notice they are doing better, they believe to learn to do takes a lot of time so being able to actually improve and do in the timeframe I do things is impossible for them so they then dismiss their own experience and what they just did as voodoo.

I had Hans several times doing that due to him was so badly damaged by golf trainers its beyond insane.

Cutting trough the red tape of the mind with previous learning’s can go so fast that it just works better from one session to another. Its basically mind blowing stuff.

In Spain he made putts like no tomorrow but he also failed to notice the experience when playing in the zone and I pointed this out, this is your ten under game and he said, no it isn’t and went on and make 3 birdies the last 5 holes.

What’s next is beliefs people have about change and unconscious minds and that there is suppose to be in a particular unique way they will know when it happens.


I stood there with a kid, asked him what he wanted to do and he said, hit like this and then 20 minutes later he did that but he couldn’t believe I could help him do something no one had succeed to do for him.

People say this, when I see it I believe it


That’s not the way your reality and mind works.

You might not believe this what I write, and your fully entitled to your opinion but your still wrong.

Maybe you can accept that or not, I don’t care.
Your still wrong.
Human beings have no behavior for that.

I can do things with an individual no psychologist or therapist or NLPér can do.

They cant believe I am able to do that when no one else is not that is way more famous and in some cases the developer of the technology but that wont matter.

Humans have a strong aversion when they are wrong and that humans cant handle. Its not a good evolutionary trait to have but I assume it has to do with evolution as survival and biology seems to indicate just that.

RBIm6 is about improving to sustain such improvement over time based upon what you can do allows you to evolve beyond self and humanity into something truly extraordinary.

Legen     wait for it     dary awesomeness.

Adal asked on the Facebook group about doing a IT Education and if I had a template for such as he become lazy using the RBIm for learning. It’s the end result being able to do it. What’s next is to organize then you want to know what someone does when they are educated from such.

A doctor for example meet patients, then they decide what tests to run to exclude illnesses or diseases, then they have skills like listen to a heart or lungs to decide if they sound alright or not, some of that we can analyze what someone who is certified in a IT education are doing and then allowing us to better learn and organize that when we engage into the class.

When I want to do better in some areas that’s what I do. If someone wants the best training in the world in some stuff they come seek me out. There is no secret that I am good at what I do.

RBIm6 allows one to improve over time to sustain and become better in what you can do. Your not stuck with what you believe how good you think you are or how you suck at something.

Its one reason people cant understand why I can do things that Richard bandler have no idea even exist with NLP.

Just saying that RBIm rocks

RBIm development

I talked to Hans yesterday, clarified some things for him as I don’t need to do much with him anymore.

It just works.

When it works is difficult to explain.

RBIm 5 is all about that establishing an application so you can develop an efficient way to make things work. It will also work on any problem or such people have, its one single solution to any problem people have in the world.

Now, that’s Nobel prize level.

I don’t have many NLP people come here and ask questions as they rather stay with someone who kills people like Bandler due to him write a few books and does a few workshops.

I ask questions and a lot of them often.

When I proposed to Hans when his lower back was in pain I told him to change his golf swing and he refused to do so in spite of the evidence that it didn’t work to do for him. I was amazed by his response as if it does not work then do something that would work.

I found out he didn’t know what to do.

I then researched and become the leading expert on golf swings in the world.

However I don’t deal with theory as I work on the athletic portion and performance to create results you want to achieve. I developed the way to do a golf swing that works even for a 68 year old. That he could go from one swing flawed from 50 years of golf to a new one knowing what the golf swing is all about.

When it works your not dealing with the worry and doubt people have normally. You be in the present and are then able to enjoy life and whatever you want to do in a way that make you calm and presently aware.

RBIm 5 allows that to happen.

One single solution to the human condition creating a R-Evolution along the way.

What Buddha tried to do, I can teach in minutes now.

Still what will happen is I cant remove the comparison mode as you need to be educated about it to understand what it does so you can move on and embrace a new future you build.

Little like the Othello game, easy to learn and a lifetime to master.

Ultimate power and golf

I tried to teach RBIm 5 to someone, they exploded from the power.

Wouldn’t that be funny if that was true?

I often find people write things that does not compute to evidence and if one look at the brochure and PR from many NLP trainers and institutes then people walk in and expect to be taught something different than what the advertisement states.

Its expected to be like that as everyone does it like that.

For me that indicates that the people teaching don’t know what they are doing and that includes names like Joseph Riggio, Richard Bandler, John Grinder, John La Valle, and any other NLP trainer like Jonathan Altfeldt along the way.

So why is then those people who claims to know not knowing then really?

I had Hans tell me this one day, I hit the ball straighter now. I asked him, well didn’t you do that before? No he said. I was like but why didn’t you tell me that? He shrugged well everyone does that out there. I was absolutely flabbergasted that he actually expected to hit the ball like everyone does it out there when I was training him to have the ultimate power in golf.

When he started to do what he can do now he is about to tell me this, why is everyone hitting it so crooked and all over the place?

I said well that’s what I do I create a new reality where whatever you want to do becomes possible.

I call it RBIm 5.

Reaching levels of becoming calm, presently aware in the now unheard before.

Oli is now plotting to take over the world….Blinkar


RBIm coaching with Hans and Mikaela Shiffrin

Had a short talk to Hans, I didn’t do anything as he is on track. Swing works, his approach now works mentally and physically.

My work is now sitting at the side and tweak and nudge as he is adjusting to what works and that is like really strange concept for many.

Mikaela is a girl that was able to understand how to go faster in slalom and been able to now win with 2.65 seconds the fourth fastest margin of win and she also has the nr1 spot with over 3 seconds!

If the Swedish national team in alpine skiing asked me I could teach them what Mikaela learned on her own. I understands what she does due to it’s the process I use with RBIm to improve performance in different sports.

She did learn that by accident by her own and many including the Hansdotter state she is talented and I say, no she is not.

You can learn what people call talent if you know what your doing.

I learned to become good in my area and field as I investigated what works and it isn’t what people believe it is.

What works is a strange concept due to people don’t know what that is.

My work with Hans is now effortless and for me its a good thing as the less I have to work the better he becomes.

Magic by science.

I just call it RBIm.

RBIm Community what one can wish for

I wish that I could work a lot more but the truth is I cant. At some point a few of my students dont understand that. One other reason is I have a strong tendency to focus on what works for me and what I want to do.

I like research, find out how things works, build models and have elite level performance for athletes.

I run the intu-flow now for soon 8 years as I like the benefit of intu-flow. The same idea applies to a community while we would think we can move the world alone with a long enough lever that’s not really how it works.

I give away as much free support I can on Skype and otherwise here. I like that idea as I have a lot of knowledge about stuff people don’t have in NLP and such places. I tell you what its like from my view and if I am wrong or right isn’t up to me to say.

I know the NLP community is dead due to them cant even fathom how to investigate anything outside what their guru says to them. I find that sad.

I wish that the RBIm community would support one another as the idea of the membership for me is to collect awesome working ideas that one can put into action immediately in some cases and in others need to learn some skills to do but still you would have a library of awesomeness at your hands.

Measurement of statement Bandler makes that I done shows he has no idea what he is talking about but it seems like he does. When you investigate people like Donald Trump which is simply a bully trying to win a presidency without any evidence he can actually do what he states.

He will repeat the same things over and over again without any evidence.
He will divert attention from the topic if he can and is allowed to do so.
Trump is a bully.

It’s a way to reinforce the positive to him and his campaign and take what people believe is true without them never really checking for if it is.

Its though if not impossible to make people think twice about the stuff they believe in. You can offer a counterexample in many ways to make people change their minds directly, Joseph Riggio does that shit so does John La Valle, Bandler, Grinder and a host of others. Main reason is that people cant make a decision for themselves that wont pass the judgment check from the individual which btw biased is totally wrong so the easy way out is to just change your mind for you as those guys do to you.

I don’t.

If you listen to my Skype chat I ask what people want to do. I did RBIm the SSG for dancing, and then lost it due to the other guy danced so much better. I said this, well if you ask this question instead that while he is good you can ask how it would be to dance and such a way in your own way.

That makes you ask a question about what you did believe as a result of your own bias and such. Now its up for him to ask the question to do that or the other thing, RBIm in practice from me btw.

He still have the choice to think the way he thought or simply go the new way.

Hans made 18 birdies in his win at the club championship but he also made 18 bogies…so he won by making a bride and the other guy hit in th water on the last hole after 4 days. I told him, go out there and do this and he told me he didn’t want to do that and I said, go do it test and report back and he did and said, oh that’s why I make a lot of bogies….Now he could choose……

Before he didn’t had such a choice he could make a bride or make a bogey but he didn’t want to make bogies but doing the Mythoself way does not work. I tried to tell Joseph that but obviously the guy refute to even think that way….

Anyhow, a community seems for me to evolve and such over time much like RBIm does. The comparison mode still is what make reality up for us that wont change or such as its how our brain works in a practical way. Making a choice is a difficult one due to your have to choose between continue to do what your doing or build new and then be able to choose which one to do is a huge gift in my view.

I believe in choice and that you should be able to make one but if your forced to change from peoples technology like NLP, Mythoself or such then what the fuck?

That seems as best backwards to me.

So NLP and Richard bandler didn’t use Modeling to create models of being happy and enjoy life.

Go figure right?

If your not happy you would assume they go, here think and do things this way and you be happy right?

But no, what they do is this, fix your problem using this x pattern.

Feeling good or feeling bad making decisions Bandlers talks about all the time?

Its bullshit again.

Think about it, how many times did you make decisions today or the last week that was heavily influenced by feeling good or bad?

For me its more like, bit tired so I go a bit more slow today, relax a bit more. Or I wake up its cold in the room due to temperature dropped outside and the heaters cant fight this so I go, ouch cold that sucks, turn the heaters up, put on a blanket, check my e-mails, smile.

At most its annoying, at worse its something else but good or bad?

My video card burned up, so I was like, ok I buy a new one but I also had to get a new screen, so I got the screen and delayed the card a couple of months and got it.

So Bandler lies to you all the time and people don’t notice that?
He spew the same crap and no one bothers to check it?

I have some facebook buddies who takes more classes to him every year and I ask why due to I could teach them stuff Bandler wont know shit about?

I guess he hypnotized them right? No free will there.

Its all a huge conspiracy according to Oli anyhow.

If we check facts and evidence, are we influenced that way feeling good make us make better decisions or feeling bad make us make worse decisions?
I guess if someone feels paranoid, scared they wont be making a lot of rational decisions sure. But is that feeling bad?

The words bad or good are quantifiers that assume that your thinking ahead that this is a good or bad thing to decide about before hand but that isn’t how people normally do make decisions.

That Bandler don’t understand that seems for me strange but not unusual.

If modeling did work the way Bandler and Grinder stated then why didn’t they study happy people that enjoyed life and taught that to you and others? It seems to me that modeling the result someone has like happy and enjoying life, isn’t possible to do with the modeling the Grinder and Bandler did and use.

For me the evidence seems to be that NLP and especially modeling does not work the way the developers of NLP state it does.

RBIm for example is a form of education its not that you apply a pattern but here we understand reality is created trough the comparison mode. Now your brain went to, what’s the comparison mode and your likely to dismiss the part of when I wrote education, right?´

Its more interesting with things we don’t know about than stuff we assume we do know about like “education” vs comparison mode”.

Why is that?

Well you might want to be educated about that.

Its not as fun I guess to educate oneself about how it really works as we assume it’s a big secret there somewhere we can find and it explain it all for us. I tend to ask someone what then is it that you want an answer to?

Rarely does it have to do with the comparison mode but the overall human condition that when we don’t know things it tickles our imagination and it then leave your fantasy your brain to imagine what you want it to be without interference from evidence/truth and such.

RBIm de-fantasy stuff for you.

Its not sexy or interesting or fascinating the star trek spock way directly but the cool thing about doing that is down the road it leads to really cool fascinating interesting stuff about life and reality and the experience of it.

What you say?