Category Archives: Golf quest

Golf swing theory

It’s a mess.

One I started to study the golf swing into more technical bits due to I assumed the golf community knew what they did and players that was good also knew. I found out the field of golf was lost and as such are confusing at best.

I study Mike Austin as I notice he hit it long and straight but also that what he did and taught wasn’t the same. In early January 2014 the model was formed, I then spent the rest of the spring and summer to work this out and added details to Hans swing over the summer.

Hans still work to make his body do it, as he can hit it long he still can make unneeded actions coming from his old days of golf swing theory. He needs to work his mobility and flexibility as he haven’t been used to do this the way he now started to do.

For me the last thing I did was that I need to work my middle and lower body to support what I want to do with my upper body. I never done that and my kinetic chain is going to be updated.

Golf swing theory are stuck with positions and technical details. My instruction is one single one that also are provided with evidence. You know if you do this when your able to do it right. You then have evidence.

Providing that evidence allows the player to learn by themselves when they do things right. Hans discover things he done and don’t need to do anymore, he adjust and do better. My recent work is pretty much about the mental side to transfer the experience to play and shoot low. Technically he is fine as 310+ yard carry will be a bit more down the road anyhow.

Golf swing theory lacks evidence, you don’t know if you do it right as they haven’t defined what that is yet. Same is true in the Mike Austin swing systems out there.

Being able to do like Mike Austin did is no guarantee you actually knows what your doing. To then teach what I am able to do is way to complex to me. I don’t even try.

As I said, integrity is key here.

h5mikep4

The above shows integrity after impact, Austin kept his. Payne Stewart lost his and Hans still have it.

The modern Sean Foley teaching? Check how badly he taught Tiger woods.

tw_thumb.png
He is a guru of swing theory calling whatever he does as a third generation swing? Seriously? Left side up, knee and pelvis snap, back twisted due to spine is going 3 different directions, that is the result of 5 years with Sean Foley the guru of the third generation golf swing.

What does integrity mean here?

It means how well do you contain the force after impact also shows how well you do at impact. Speed is key there at impact and more speed shows up after impact or not. Payne’s shoulders has turned over, so has his right side.
Austin/Hans has not.

Tiger?

Ouch its just sad, why listen to Foley guys? I don’t understand that.

Btw Hans position is slightly better than Austin there in the above images. Reason? check the width of stance.

change swings

Skärmklipprob

Comparing since august.
While the left image (yesterday) shows improvement so the upper body works now as it should, next to make the lower body and kinetic chain working to support this.

I guess the good thing is I also know what to change and do in my take away so I have things to do in during the winter.

oct 3

new

so while things starts to work it’s a lot more to do.
First to have the take away and back swing better and I know what to do then have the support and improved kinetic chain.

This are changes that will take all winter to work on and find out what kind of support is needed since that will be mainly a discovery down the road as my swing motion will change along the way.

The front images shows I made good progress without even practice swinging much if at all. Integrity is started to work, my position at impact is similar to Payne Stewart atm due to the lower/middle body isn’t activated as it should.
Not surprised since this instruction changes how I do swing.

Its not like when you know what to do its easy. For example we know how to go to the Moon or Mars even, it doesn’t mean its easy to do it. Its easy to make someone pregnant in most cases but it isn’t easy to raise a kid.

I told Simon what to do also, while he seldom practices even he will have issues to some extent to do and still he done some good progress during this summer.

The below images of Simon goes in progression and the one from yesterday is in blue/purple shirt.

impacto

imapctonyasimon oct 2014

Now he started to look right at impact and this will continue to be work he does next year.
Irons is one thing the nr1 change he needs to learn is to hit the driver.

Awesome golf mechanics or?

Hitting it long is just part of an equation. Without consistency to produce the distance and accuracy you just cant score well.

Tour pros are constantly battling inconsistency, their swings breaks down and needs fixing and are a composite of compensations. A modern swing loose integrity at around 270 yards and then the accuracy starts to decline rapidly so its one reason you see the long hitters on the PGA tour need to have a great iron play and one that has that is Bubba Watson.

There is a lot of swing theory out there and many ideas about it and some are able to play with them due to starting at an early age and worked the swing from such an age for 15 years. An amateur will struggle with them if any golf forum is to be trusted for feedback and evidence.

Myself I started with golf at age 28 or so hitting balls with friends, and since I never really desired to play any tour or to be a tour player I was happy as it was. I coached a guy so when he run into back injury and didn’t want to change his swing I figure that I need to study some golf swing theory since why don’t he want to change as he should know this stuff right?

I thought it be easy to changes wings since surely the golf field knew their stuff right?

I found that a tour player are basically clueless about their own swing and what they are doing. They don’t know much if any of this shit. Once Hans started to listen and changed his swing he went from compensations and complicated to simple and easy and distance is beyond what he ever could imagine. His back injuries went away also. This all happen over a period of time while I started to study the golf swing and I only did offer him change when I calculated it would work for him.

I wasn’t satisfied with his progress as I also wanted to define the swing model from my study of Mike Austin. That have taken me a while but now when its complete as far I can tell Hans will hit it longer from his current 310+ carry with driver and I wouldn’t be surprised if he reach a 340 or so average later on. I talk carry btw not carry + roll.  Maintaining accuracy once you hit 310 yards are important, adding accuracy to this is what I do with the RBIm technology behind me.

Now some wont believe that is doable or possible due to using modern swing theory this isn’t doable to do. However that a tour pro is able to do is one thing the question would be can a 67 year old start to learn this and add more speed and add accuracy to it?  I think so as my own experience started to do this allowed me to play flawless golf. Every shot went where it should with deadly accuracy and I knew this worked just fine. Considering the weather and temperature I was hitting some drives that would been too long in the summer way beyond what I done earlier. Best of all, those swings felt effortless and without the support with body mechanics to add upon this more distance will come.

I was simply doing something I haven’t been able to do before. For me it was enough evidence to support the model itself. Long with accuracy.

As I stated before, 300+ yards with 4% dispersion. Nothing else comes close out there in the world.

You either have to sacrifice distance to gain accuracy as tour pros has to or add distance and sacrifice accuracy as you cant contain integrity with either or with current swing theory trainers and models.

The RBIm swing model however is able to contain both for integrity to have great distance and accuracy to support your game of golf.

The RBIm swing model checks to achieve 300+ yards with 4% dispersion pattern.

I be hitting balls hopefully with Simon my sisters kid this weekend and will shoot some swings from there.

I couldn’t understand why Hans didn’t want to change his swing, for me its like, if it don’t work and your injured then change the swing? However he had fought the modern swing theory in this case the Ballard connection swing and he believed from fear that a new swing wouldn’t work better. His experience with the swing for 20 years showed him this is true and cant be better.

Now?

He thinks I am a genius.

He swings better than he ever been able to and he is just crushing it.

Now swinging at 130mph or so isn’t effortless in itself you need to maintain and hold onto the force you create but still whatever he was taught from modern swing theory don’t even come close to what he is able to do nowadays.
I am currently working more with his focus and experience to maintain a high end zone like state when playing to focus on the task at hand and doing his best as I don’t need to do much with his swing mechanics these days.

Today is is grateful he changed his swing but before that he thought he be struggling with it and now he don’t need to.

Did I know I would be able to create such swing model as I have?

Of course not but if someone is able to do one like Mike Austin did do then there is also a way he did achieve his result. At age 78 he was still hitting 300 yard drives or more. Many kids age 20 cant get those distances. He could hit a one iron off the deck but kids today often cant.

For me, watching what Mike Austin did and what he taught and what others did, wasn’t a match there was discrepancy there. It don’t mean they cant hit it long, Mike Dunaway hit it 380 yards without trying. Jacob Bowden went from a 14 handicapper to compete with 400 yard drives.

But swing like Mike Austin and his swing speeds? Not really.

So I set out to produce such a model that took whatever Mike Austin did do without knowing what he actually did and then replicate that into a way to train yourself to gain the same set of integrity he had.
Its one reason when Hans Andersson swings it looks like a Mike Austin style swing. He still have a few things to get identical from his own swing motion style but its close now. So while I fight my illness and physical limitation I still will be able to do it even at a slower pace but it do work.

The season is about to end here and the results and evidence of this have to wait a bit more as I am gathering data atm for how well it works. I know it does but evidence from other players will add a better coherency and find any potential flaws in the instruction set.

It has to be awesome right?

Plenty of distance, deadly accurate and simple.

Driver model is Hans Andersson a few days doing the new instruction

 

Hans hitting 9i his best ever

 

The original model

Gameplay or golf swing?

Many focus on the golf swing due to we as a golfer struggles more with that than the gameplay.

Since I solved the Mike Austin mystery or secret focus now becomes more about the gameplay to express the golf swing into the arena to score. Naturally I done so all the time, making better decisions, improved putting skills and drill making better distance control to dial in distances as I always hit pin high in my shots.

Scoring is though due to once you mastered the distance and accuracy with the golf mechanics, you then rely on distance to pin and putting.

Its then about state and your experience.

How well you maintain the same flow, zone etc..state you play from to focus your attention he essentials.

Whenever I work with someone I ask, have you master the basic technique or not? I then if they haven’t wait until they do. I want to hit longer someone say, I go do you have the technique to do so? if not we need to do that first.

An amateur for example will slow down the pitch or chip, they will not put spin on the ball due to them use to long back swing for such shots. That result in inconsistency. I tell them, shorten the backs wing, loosen wrists spin the ball. Naturally they don’t want to do that as they feel like they loose control and I go, the main reason I don’t work with amateurs is the lack of doing things with motivation and results.

If Luke Donald came to see me, I had him hit the ball 30 yard longer in 2 hours. Then I have to spend time answering his questions how this is possible when none of his trainers cant do it for him. I then could explain it to him as he would be happy to have those 30 yards extra as he then would be able to regain his NR1 spot in the world.

Hans for example I expect to add 30 more yards to his 310yards he currently carry…the driver. Adding a different loft to his driver he is likely to hit it longer as it is.

Larry has a 280 yard long drive this season and I fully expect him to have 300 whenever he is done with the new change.

Then as anything else, how then to use this golf swing to score is next that alone will take longer to cover and do due to skills like scoring is all dependent on your maintaining the focused zone state over time. Some master it faster and they just go and do it. Others keep dropping it to check what happens around them.

Its as anything else, learnable.

Scoring in the end is how we view the performance. Cant score don’t matter how good golf swing you have or how long you hit it if you cant make the putts. I am surprised to why golf theory still sticks with trackman. You don’t need that to view if your shots are good, do you spin it to much? that you will see and feel when hitting the shots either do a custom fit for the set or change the angle into the ball. The amateur wants trackman as it verify their difference and allow better feedback for them, but a pro already have a better system inside them.

I utilize that system to build a feedback system for them internally.

Its then easier for them to do their shot making, they can continue to do what they are used to do. Hans for example can hit longer but his distance control stays the same. I had to build such a system for him as he then would hit to long or short when a change was made so I standardized it for him. Now he can make any changes and his gameplay don’t change much except his effort to is lessen to do things.

Its not just about the golf swing, gameplay or scoring its all the things that has to work from a standpoint of making it work. Mistakes are hard to recover from, make one bogie and you need to make a birdie to recover it, but a double or triple? It’s a disaster for a pro. We want to make sure we cant do mistakes.

I designed the models and systems so those mistakes cant happen.

Golf swing Integrity

A golf swing is to transport a ball to a target to achieve a result.

Integrity in the swing motion means the ability to maintain the force within its frame of motion.

A modern swing like Butch Harmon, Ballard, Foley, Haney etc….breaks its integrity at around 270 yards give or takes. Once the limit for the swing motion breaks down the player has to compensate either slow it down to maintain accuracy or speed up for distance and in both cases integrity of the swing motion is lost.

The below images are from Hans, Mike and Payne. Two of them haven’t lost their integrity but the third one has, Payne. One could logically argue that Payne won 3 majors so its then better to loose integrity right?

h5mikep3

Payne when swinging cant add more distance due to he then start to loose accuracy. Its like Lydia Ko, she hit it left now and then due to her swing causes that for her as she goes on playing and cant contain the force. The main reason is her movement of the right leg do to her pelvis rotation is getting her out of integrity a lot.

A golf swing theory trainer would try to slow down the swing for the player, to make compensation to happen to use a driver hold off release. Like Adam Scott here. Who not only lost integrity here but also have to save himself to make it work using a drive hold off release containing and maintaining the two forces he battles.

scott

A swing motion normally can have a blend between distance and accuracy, I view it using dispersion patterns with accuracy and carry for distance. You might hit it 350 yards but if you use roll then you cant control the ball. Carry allows you to control the distance, roll does not. Dispersion whenever someone wins on the PGA tour they display a 4% or such dispersion those 4 days. They hit it closer to pin and they also make more putts that week. Example, Petterson won the memorial a few years back and he missed maybe one putt within 7 feet for 4 days.  His record other weeks and days will be different.

Mapping the integrity in a golf swing also can be mapped to putting, chipping and pitching. An amateur slows down a chip and a pitch. A pro accelerates trough the impact. I worked to accelerate my chipping and pitching and sand saves due to if I don’t then I be more inconsistent. Naturally with the time I can spend to practice it means I make mistakes now and then.

To learn to accelerate make short take away with chipping and pitching and loosen up the grip pressure.

I see people view modern golf tour pro swings as a model to look forward to replicate and I don’t as all I see are players loosing integrity all the time and lack the ability to maintain consistency.

I simply built a model to learn to maintain integrity, hit it long maintain dispersion and then achieve consistency.

I do believe I succeeded.

I call it the RBIm golf swing model.

About kinesiology language in a golf swing

I seldom if ever use jargon, kinesiology don’t make me go, wow I get that. Naturally we can use technical language but that wont mean you will either understand it or be able to do it as it will only lead to pointless debates.

I say external rotation of the shoulder it might not be exactly precise language or what exactly actually happens but you will understand that your right shoulder has to rotate in a fashion. I can also add upon that the Mike Austin mechanics and make it so your swinging longer, more accurate and with less effort.

Now you have a problem as anyone who is doing swing theory will try to fix your swing as your flipping it, your loosing out on the rotation. Either a friend or a golf trainer who sees you.

It happens to Hans all the time, trainers tell him about theory when he outhit them with 60 yards. Other players talks theory and he outhits them with 40 yards without even trying. And he has carry they don’t as they need roll. I suggested a customfit for Hans to carry two drivers one for roll and one for carry. Then he likely hit 100 yards longer than those guys. Normally runs out of fairway before then but still.

Theory sucks, it has more often than not no agreement as people still debate if Hogan supinated or pronated his left arm or not. I cant think about what a golf swing is in such terms. For me its movement and athletic such. However I understand many wants it to feel secure and safe to think their position makes them a better golfer.

Its just don’t.

Problem is teaching the concepts.

Whenever I teach I talk about it I also demo the movements and offer evidence for it when your doing it right. Once you do it right the ball starts to go long and straight. Then you just keep doing the same and add more speed as your habit continues to grow.

after

If you lack the speed then technique training is needed trouble is none I know off can offer you that out there that actually works to settle your golf swing into a swing.

It either let you go short and accurate or long and wild.

 

Hans as I stated before are suppose to be a 310+ and a 4% dispersion golf swing player. Once he starts doing the 4% as an average he be pretty much unbeatable.

Now I do all that without using complicated language, I show him what I want him to do and he can do it without any issues as I let him add his own athletic instinct into the learning. I don’t teach kinesiology language with positions.

That shit is worthless to use for a golfer.

h7

Once you hit this kind of position in your golf swing your swinging at a great golf speed. as you maintain integrity of the shoulders and let the support make you release all out.

I made the same video for Hans as I did for Larry.

Its not needed to use complex language.

What is need is to test and create enough variation to then attend the feedback and take note do I swing faster and better doing this right?

I do.

Simon my sisters kid complain as whenever we go to the range I have him do new things, he tells me he haven’t practiced the last one as he normally don’t go hit balls on his own. I tell him, this makes it easier and it always does after him doing it for 20 minutes. I also say this makes it easier and why then should you practice something that might take longer then?

Once I played with my friend I knew one thing that I was done it took me since the model as finalized in January to test and run trough enough variations about 9 more months but the model is defined. For me its just one thing to do.

OTT or Over the top or not?

Golfers all face the same thing that learning swing mechanics is a though thing to get right. Every golf forum is filled with how do I do it or how do I fix this or such. For many this becomes a fascination in itself to be more technical minded and to dwell into the details of how a finger moves. I understand such and it might be good but can also lead you into darkness and more detail than needed.

Over the top or OTT is when the right shoulder goes internal rotation from the top instead of externally rotates from the start top position. Instead of locking the right shoulder the socket the muscles does a judo throw over the shoulder socket which leads us to let the right elbow to go up and around in the down swing.

The Gif is Rory doing a proper top action External

 

 

The red shirt guy isn’t doing it right  Internal. (Kelvin research)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I been suffering from it and its been so bad I cant use a conventional grip anymore without doing it so I changed my grip.

Here is Larry 3 days ago a typical slight OTT with a spin around to the left side from the top. The second swing is 3 days later with new instruction. The OTT is now gone.

Main reason why this happens is that he now shallows out the shaft better obviously in the down swing which are due to the external rotation he now started to do. To shallow out the shaft in the down swing, then you need to do a proper external rotation of the right shoulder. I been reading up on fixes for the OTT over the years but none of them have worked for me.

I am a fan of concepts for sure my instructions are based upon detailed analysis but once formulated then the instruction itself is vague. The brain cant do detail that will fuck it up. If you are free to form a reference then you will find one that works for the task at hand.

So I asked what make it so you can always do a external rotation?

Once you are able to do that then you will find a proper action in the down swing and so it seems.

This works even for a tour Pro like Hans.

Many believe a tour pro have perfect swings, none of them do and many have huge compensations in them and they can play the tour due to them don’t go overboard with their game they stay with the game they know as if they go outside it then their score goes out the window and blue screens.

Naturally this new instruction allows you to start removing the OTT action you done and start activating the muscles of the right side, the scapula contraction and the latimuss dorsi and other spinae muscles also.

My thesis here was if one is able to do a proper external rotation as it seems its need to do for a good golf swing the question then becomes how to make sure your able to do it right. Hans, is for example surprised about it.

He hit a 375 yard carry driver with the new move.

He said it’s a bit longer now… Problem for him with irons is to much spin on the ball. I suggested a check with custom fitting to find more optimal launch angles for him.

While a tour pro will have any swing working for them the question still will be how consistent can you do it. Brian Gay for example don’t load his right side and activate them properly and he also hit it short but have superb putting to make him play the tour. Once you hit more greens and are more consistent then its all down to close to pin and putting.

A swing like Brian gay for example is so timing/compensation based its for me surprising he even can play the tour. A rising up at impact, not loading the right side properly etc…

 

The idea here is to train oneself to feel the external rotation and make sure it works as you then can speed up the swing motion. You can add likely 10-30mph depending what swing speed you had from the start once your movement starts to work for you.

Reaching the potential you have much like Mike Austin did.

Quotes from people and then what?

It’s a step and throw “Mike Austin.
Cool Mike please ask any Mike Austin trainer out there what that is and what to do to do that. None can answer you.

It’s a direction. “Richard Bandler”
Like gravity? Please ask any bandler trainer out there what that means.

Conceptual stuff like the above sounds nice on a brochure or in their heads. Its just this thing about our perception and consciousness that gets in the way to bridge the gap in between.

I was told that we take people where the problem isn’t, then asked the guy what to do and he told me stories that had no answer.

I am like, what?

I am like either I know or I say I don’t know or I guess. Trying to bridge the gap in between what I do and know and to get a message across to someone who has no rudimentary understanding about consciousness and their own thinking and perception isn’t easy at all.

For example I made this blog post earlier which takes a new concept to the table that there is no disassociation. It’s a groundbreaking concept that advances for example NLP and therapy with 20 years. I understand that but still it might be just me.

And that is how things start with one individual, then someone else might get it and so on until it reaches critical mass and the stuff becomes common sense and knowledge and then a new reality have been formed. That process takes decades btw.

When I was growing up there was a huge debate about acupuncture and things like chiropractic’s. It was all in the head a placebo. The people against that have since died out and the others have been more acceptable. Those newton fans back in 1920 also died out and Einstein’s theory of relativity today is fully a thing that pretty much anyone just assumes always been there.

I had this kid in my class once, he said but none of them thinks like me? I said yes I know but for him he suddenly understood that people was different than him in thinking. His father a Indi man became highly upset with me as I made his son free to choose things differently from culture and social integration that IMO pretty much suck ass.

When I go study things for me I always ask what’s the practical way, concepts are nice but I also know people seek comfort in them and quote them and thinks they understand them but that isn’t true as I ask them questions they cant answer. Maybe you know I should stop and just let the world continue to spin as it spins and just accept the way people think about the world that I just think is nuts as they fail to find the most common things that is there but I digress.

Concepts create a false sense of knowing, if Mike Austin said step and throw and demoed it people then think wow, that is it and then you continue to ask, so how do I do that step and throw, the answer isn’t there.

One of my quests as I call them has been to uncover the bridge of gaps between what people come to believe and think is real and they assume is correct and the difference of correlation to actual understanding and ability to do. I think that is one of the key things lacking in todays human world.
Its not a great job or such either as its not that appreciated due to the nature of people who simply don’t get it like the whole NLP world that haven’t yet asked me how to go from NLP to the future NLP called RBIm. I run the scenario it what NLP needs to go to and soon and just ask me guys….Ler

However as anything its easier much easier to accept that we don’t get it that we lack the gap and the information about it that we turn away from the challenge and difficulty and ignore it fully to just go to eat our food and live our life in ignorance that is easier and more acceptable also to do none will blame you for doing just that.

Does our action creates consequences and sure they do but sometimes all of them are correct and proper and sometimes we do things we do and people tells us its not the good thing to do its a bad thing like if your not sad at a funeral you’re a bad person as your not going along the social convention people subscribe to without even knowing they do.

So I am different then I guess, I don’t mind that I am different but other people have a strong tendency to not accept that as it makes them uncomfortable to face their own self’s their own world as they cant get that acceptance from me.

I see people how they are not what they think they are.

Naturally there is a huge discrepancy between those.

I pointed out to people about what Mike Austin did say and teach and it doesn’t match and more have suddenly started to see that also. It isn’t an answer in itself but at least it starts to question the current teachings and validity of such to then ask us differently what to do about that.
I taught Hans how to do this, and he now will do it even better the coming weeks.

Mixing things like Golf, minds and life you know for me there is no difference, swinging a club is mechanics but then also perception and feel and that upon itself also make us form stuff that we think we do but might not do so life comes along this also.

I just like to be able to answer the what as none could answer me.

Ongoing and I suspect it will never end Blinkar

Can you become good? The tree story

There are several ways we can become good at stuff. We can practice and using a role model we can gather their aptitudes with failed practice. To do it then compare to the role model and then do it again until it matches the role models result. (Larp) Live action role play.

If you want to learn to be a doctor you practice with mistakes with feedback to what you did and then do it again, if you want to do better golf you practice with mistakes with feedback to what you did and then do it again but all level of performances are depending on skills.

If you break down every sport you finds skills if you break down things like writing books, screenplays etc…or something else there are skills involved that one if identified can practice and improve upon.

NLP for example studied therapy how a really skilled therapists did things that worked to overcome problems for their clients. Those skills were mapped and put into working models (NLP Patterns) that when you practiced those gained skills that allowed you to to achieved results like those therapists had. You then become better than average therapist doing therapy in less time than what was believed to be needed in the field a one week practitioner can sometimes do things 5 years of university don’t even come close to.

In Golf many study golf swings, I don’t. I study how to play golf better. Mike Austin was the chosen role model for the golf swing but I choose other models to play golf. I looked at Nicklaus and others for different parts of the game.

What’s dominant is consistency but none of them can teach you consistency. Even them themselves had issues now and then to do consistency. Nicklaus however had his competitive drive to make him either win or be a runner up. It wasn’t his swing, putting or such but his competitive drive that allowed him to play his best every time. If one look at the wrong thing that people do to succeed and come to believe its the golf swing that makes you a scratch or tour pro then your in trouble.

I found for me a way to hit the ball straight recently, I changed my grip to a split one and then everything started to come together. Everything I cant do with those other grips I can do with a split grip and it helped me identify the back swing and the down swing flaws I have a tendency to do now and then.
Its due I look for patterns things you do that if you don’t evolve and succeed and make progress I then change things to make such progress and succeed.

Most don’t, they cant change due to them believe in the technology, trainer, method etc..or the common assumed belief shared along the community there.  I just don’t.

Think about this as, if you do improve it means you never get stuck, if your curve of improvement halts then you need to alter and change something due to your limiting or blocking yourself out. Often due to the belief the trainer put in you to assume to be true. Its common in every sport I checked that people do things there based upon assumed correct beliefs instead of results.

I start with success, that you already can do it, whatever happens to get you there will then be much easier. For example if you cant contain your experience doing things like the zone etc..its due to your not comfortable into letting the brain produce it due to the wrong focus and attention markers like the golf swing technique, positions etc…if the experience is disturbed a lot (compared) the brain cant produce a winning performance experience.

A Mike Austin swing wont transform you into a new Jack Nicklaus or Rory Mcilroy as you need other skills to do that.

Once the skills are there and your able to remove obstacles (habits/Beliefs/assumptions etc..) you learned to be able to sustain your experience over a period of time (zone) you then will be able to be good and do good.

We cant cheat us there, the skills needs to be there so we can focus solely to just play well if its golf or to coach someone into success as a client or whatever else the end result is simple attention to the thing that works to do the skills well.

Such practice however reside on perceived feedback and if you do what many does its easy to be seduced you did improved when you didn’t. I check facts what you actually did do. If your able to do that and not some fictive imagined level you didn’t do or the common I practice like this and I will get better due to the trainer said so and I then check what they do and they are not improving the way they think they are.

I then remove the technique focus and go primal and soon they make putts from everywhere, hit the drives longer and more straight. Better focus allows your experience to produce a better performance.
However many cant do this due to them believe something else makes them succeed and do better that has nothing to do with performances. Then that whatever they come to believe will get in their way to succeed.

I taken diagnosed dyslexics and in an hour transformed them to not be dyslexics anymore.

For the field of science with established technology they cant understand what I done and does and here is the kicker, they don’t want to know either as it makes them uncomfortable with success. So in 10 years time no scientist yet has called me and wanted to study what I do yet.

It’s the best technology in the world out there to handle dyslexia.

Its just make beliefs and assumptions people have about dyslexia and how to help them uncomfortable as they need to let go of old beliefs and assumptions.

Its as true with golf and its people there.

People come to believe reality is built one way, we don’t have the sensitivity normally to argue and check for differences and we accept the leading field what they do and say. If someone does do things differently that works better people still wont accept it as its contradicts the accepted way to do things currently people agreed upon. The brain perceptually do things based upon perception of maps, we are contextually accessing information based upon the context and neural nets in our brain wont be changing soon as a neural net is a signal value so what we do is to build new such neural nets than can draw upon them new information and the essential old one that works to do it.

There is no change or transformation of your performance, life, brain, problem etc..we just build new.

Once you understand that approach I do with RBIm you cant be stuck or limited.

You always build new. You then combine the new with the old that works to produce the desired result.

The brain makes a check to context and since you built a new one then it starts to sue that instead, just like that. The brain don’t make guesses or think it just runs on signal values we receive from the environment and our own thinking. If your own thinking makes you react and respond in a pattern then you build new and bring the new stuff you want and then the old stuff needed will be there also as the brain will fire new neural net threads to support the new action. Due to the nature of neurons and nets this can take some time to stabiles to the individual depending on what it is about.

Its like a tree branch, you plant a new tree next to the old one, the old tree sends a branch to the new tree and you then when you planted it with new information soon are able to increase the signal to use the new tree instead of the old one that slowly fades and the better your able to distinguish between the old and the new one the faster the transgression happens.

If we repeat stuff we grow faster signals in the neural net. If we build new then this interrupts the old signal and we can then adjust to the new. The brain is good doing faster with current information and once we established a new reference the new will become faster soon also.

As I found how to hit it straight I took notice it was a new thing I wasn’t used to do that and become as I played into this idea of accepting when I did it this way then it just went straight. And as I played this was a new experience that I haven’t had before. So as I played and this become accepted to me I then could start doing that and play from that reference. I was able to identify 3 things I did that I wasn’t aware off I did do. That alone allowed me to understand why I was struggling with the other grip and the mechanics.

If you do become stuck, a change of perspective might help, ask someone, read or check a video, or to do a change routine or something else as soon you do that what happens is a change of context is applied. Your moving your attention from the inside of one context to another and then the difference between those allows you to build a new branch and to discover a whole new tree.

That works.

8july golf swing progress

32celcius today so hot out there.

spent some time on the range with sis kid.

ned
while things is improving I was so tired I even thought I would faint. However still standing. I tried a split grip today as it felt like I could get my back swing in order better and the down swing also and both assessment was confirmed.
I also discovered I could do a even better release which wasn’t happening here in the video. I been fighting the swing motion a bit so decided to try this which worked just fine, solid shots followed.
Its still early but with a better release action should improve things a bit more. I would like to lessen the secondary tilt a bit on the top of back swing but in all the way I hit the ball was solid.

efter