Talent code and cracking the code

While talent can be said to be skills, the building blocks to create the talent themselves been a mystery a long time and the book by David Coyle showed along some like professor Anders Eriksson with his 10000 hours of deliberate practice that talent is created not a born ability.

No one been able to copy a golf swing from Ben Hogan or anyone else in the history of the game, then I came along and did that with Mike Austin’s motion and transfer that skill to Hans Andersson.

When you know what to do as I do then there is no secret or mystery.

I been an amateur in regard to golf, I play with friends for fun and laughter. Never been concern with pro golf or such. That changed as I met Hans. As he injured himself with his modern golf swing and didn’t want to change I then had to build him a new swing.

So I did.

Talent are skills, trainable such.

Chess is a memory thing, to be better at chess you train memory for positions and can raise your chess rating with a few thousand points that way. You don’t need to think ahead or be creative you need a good memory and knowing chess positions. If you do that you be beating your chess friends easily.

If you believe it is something else when you practice chess then that wont improve your skills or results.

I spent 8 sessions practice the new golf template I developed. In each session I run the cracked code of how to build talent and then add improvement in each session. Golfers normally understand to build a new swing takes 2 or 5 years like Tiger with Sean Foley and then still failing so golfers knows how difficult it is.

To then apply the cracked talent code to the practice as I do allows me to do things faster than anyone else can do in the world.

When you end up with the “can do” criteria then your done.
How fast will that happen then?
It depends.

Most I seen with Hans is 3 weeks when he implemented a movement and that was mainly due to lacking the flexibility and he needed time to adjust for it. Normally its really fast.

  1. You need a good template.
  2. You implement the RBIm talent program for practice
  3. You end up with “Can do”.

Yes it means you be able to swing like Mike Austin did if you apply that template.

You cant replace 50 or so years playing golf due to golf include other skills than hitting a golf ball but at least you have a good solid foundation to start from.

Most assume this

However, if you use the modern swing like thedanplan did then you will fail. Back pain, short hitting and failure no matter how much deliberate practice you do and he had professor Anders Eriksson’s support.

You need a template that’s good not one that suck.

Then your practice will enhance and improve what your doing so you can reach the same skill set Mike Austin had or as someone else had. However what people believe is true like a held off release, a modern swing and then constant back problems and short hitting then you keep on believing that even if someone like Boklov came along with the V-style as people laughed then he won the title and no one laughed anymore as they all changed to the new V-style,same way flosbury flop did in high jumping.

Practice isn’t enough, bad practice is even worse and reason for many to believe in the talent myth. While having a good coach an expert in the field like Monte schienblum isn’t enough as what he teaches isn’t good enough. You end up failing as its to difficult to do consistently.

Then we move into the performance arena in why some people are able to do better than others consistently those elite level performers’. How do you practice that?

Question: Where do one find the 2 shot difference in ones golf game?

Peak book strategy
By being specific about what to do?
Intense focus then wont help.
Direct Feedback wont help.
Discomfort or comfort wont help either.
Coaching from experts wont work either.

A new approach is then needed.

Question: Where do one find the 2 shot difference in ones golf game?

RBIm talent build program

Identify the skill set needed in the performance.
Analyze important variables, ex: proximity to hole, putting.
Ask, can one do those to required skill level?
if so, the solution isn’t skill in its technical nature.
Answer: The state of mind then influence ones performance.

What are then the performance skill needed to focus ones performance to bring out ones best consistent performance?

Check experts: super confidence Bob Rotella, check source Rory loose his game miss the cut, super confidence isn’t the answer.

Identify great performances and map mind focus to find a solution.

Golf is distance control, that means judgement of distance and execution of distance needs to match.
That’s easy.

To bring out ones precision control to be able to repeat ones performance each time however isn’t.

Analyzing performance and mind focus shows people are tracking a target and executing based upon external raw data. Assumption wrong in science, there is no external data.
New revision created based on observation of performances in the zone.

New model derived to be tested.
Test: Solution worked.
Implementation of model is next.

Understanding the difference
to create distinctions of difference is the main goal in any practice.

To develop such models one need to understand the essence of the skill in context and then be able to check difference and teach that difference to someone so they can experience that vs whatever they been doing previously.

A template then with a instruction set to match allows a faster route to “can do”.

How much time to improve? or talent building

It depends due to feedback of difference is different.

My first session informed me a lack of power, so that was easy to fix as I made adjustment coming home after watching on video why that was. Second session showed me power was there.

That was an easy solution. Improvement was good.

Next was to create a better pelvis movement based on throw mechanics and that’s taken 3 more sessions. In my terms, that’s reasonable time spent to change the movement one does to a new one. I haven’t done the new one before so making the body able to do that obviously is a hurdle of new. Today it felt like progress as I started to do what I wanted but was on and off and it wasn’t optimal. I got to a point where I felt like I could start swinging with the movement.

So once I have progress, and can swing with the movement then next step towards a working movement is close. Once you get there then you can just do it, its then done.

How long that takes has to do with quality of feedback or what some call deliberate practice. The progress often goes slowly at first then accelerate as your started to build enough feedback and crescend when your able to do.

  1. Want to improve skill, bridge the gap between knowledge and doing.
  2. Define new and old action.
  3. Utilize the feedback for difference.
  4. Do I do more of the new or continue to do the old?

At some point frustration happens as your brain is firing to accommodate the learning and when you become slightly excited its when your brain has started to kick in the new direction.

That process can take a few minutes or be longer depending what quality of feedback is used. I use the reference “can do” once that happens practice is done and over as you can do. Before you can do your learning take time to bridge the gap and how fast that happens is depending on how good your quality of feedback is.

Usually you be highly focused on the task itself (deep focused stare) to isolate the movement itself due to your brain cant separate one (old/new) from one another. Once your able to do that your then able to improve massively in a short timeframe.

Then the step to “can do ”isn’t far away.

while this is a few years ago the swing movement was changed to “can do” in a single session and the -4c wasn’t helping either.

Learning faster

The idea is really simple, do more and add feedback for improvement.

So for example, make a golf swing movement, then video it, check for positions and evidence of doing the movement properly, then adjust accordingly to the model, do it again.

Normally 3 to 5 such is enough to start make the new to work.

I do 2, one with whatever the state the swing is in and then check and then do a new one with the feedback implemented. If improved I then stop for the day.

Live – action- role – play or LARP is the way this works.

Its simple and fast.

Sure you can then add to that using definitions, the model applied and various focused attention markers as I do to aid the process but the overall usage wont be different.

Test again.

In a few days your movement has been built and works.

The things you do

What do people use their skills for one can ask.

I sit in front of the computer a lot so for me comfort with sitting and what else and a highly effective state of experience. So I just made sure doing that allow me a high functional state.

In the sofa I wind down a bit relaxing.

One can say you optimize to make whatever you do more efficient. Issue can be your not coming from a good point, like the golf swing for example even if you work at it wont matter as it will break down due to modern theory got things wrong.

You then need to adapt a new tactic a new strategy but if you don’t believe in that you use talent code stuff the 10k hour stuff to practice and practice so many hours believing in something that wont work.

Now and then doing the same thing over and over again is insane.

But some will say the book what about the book the science professor the 10k guy saying you need to deliberate practice and I say, he don’t understand this. ts like golf trainers 4 of them working with Tiger and none changed his core body mechanics, none and I know why.

You want to understand.

You want to have a solid basis for effective improvement to increase efficiency.

Otherwise increasing from the standpoint wont be optimized. Golfers struggle constantly due to their swing changes from day to day or swing to swing and they don’t know why, so they go back to fix it again and again and it just repeats itself.

Same thing with experience we have, things we do in daily life, if you have a solid basis for what your doing increasing efficiency is a good thing and if one needs to optimize one may need a new strategy or such to be better at it.

But that area of field the professor know nothing about, David Coyle same thing breaking down the talent into building a model from building talent, I did, its one of those I built over the period of research. That allows me to condense what I am doing into direct element of talent instead of waiting for someone to tell me, I need to practice when you do this model that isn’t needed.

But it also goes against conventional beliefs people have, including professors.

This is btw highly precision work one I cant disclose in a written word or even when I do this on video as you cant see what’s going on anyhow, not even the one experience it wont be able to except they will notice the result.

Then obviously to accept that they are now doing something they including others thought impossible?

Yea take some getting used to.

That’s how good I am.

The models allows one to express a highly functional experience

Is there a Optimal Godlike learning strategy out there?

I just call it RBIm.

One ask, so what is it that I would want to learn?

Now this opens up a can of worms.

That’s to generic.

So let specify it a bit.

I want to learn to juggle, or to make a great food for dinner or such.

What’s the result of making it that way then?

Most would now picture a perfect outcome.

That’s another can of worms.

Perfect wont be there as first your likely to fail due to you cant do it yet.

Make dinner means your doing the same food for a few weeks to improve the recipe, the ingredients until it taste the way you want it to. Knowing that ahead of time isn’t the same as actually doing it and you will fail before your able to do it.

Most however get stuck on the fail part and give up thinking but what about my perfect outcome?

That’s a memory.

Your brain cant do memories that way as its not connected in reference to contextual experience. yes it’s a “thing of sorts”.

That’s why for example Robert Dilts need to come and see me and talk about this stuff he does so he can update his encyclopedia of NLP. I digress tho.

Once you have an idea of the result you want, then its all about connecting that created memory to reality in experience. One measure this by making the behavior to count for what’s going on.

Most believe they need more information, books, tapes, videos, workshops and whatever else. What you need is more failures.

That has feedback built in within that.

First dinner taste funny, or is to loose to shady and texture isn’t right so next you locate why that is, adjust and do another dinner with the adjustment until the texture is right.

But that isn’t so advanced?

No, it isn’t.

People don’t notice they progress what they measure is what they believe is suppose to happen vs what actually does happen.

Now that’s another can of worms right there.

If your not tracking what happens vs what you believe is happening then how can you even think it will work ever?

While I am all for hope, faith and whatever else it wont be useful to do it those ways as your doing things (Practice) and ignoring the obvious (you can do it already) and then fail to note you already mastered the skill and achieved the result.

So the golfer that now can do something he didn’t believe he could in 2 minutes (50 yard increase driver) then reacted by saying that’s impossible even when he was the one doing the impossible.

15 minute range session the amateur golfer are making perfect swings each time with fabulous contact and becomes so high he can hardly walk. To then stay with the new was a challenge but his handicap went down during summer.

When you have a dyslexic and then in 2 minutes they aint dyslexics anymore they don’t understand what the issue is but their parents, teachers and professors cant believe it did happen as you know dyslexia is for life without solution.

They didn’t notice the feedback that was there, they didn’t measure the progress that was actually happen right in front of their eyes even though I had parents that cried of relief due to their child now wasn’t dyslexic anymore. They didn’t care what I did as it, worked.

So learning is more about how you measure or not the progress happening vs what you believe should happen or whatever you assume happens.

When I do a class and people say ok that was easy what’s next, it means they learned to do a highly complex skill without understanding how they did learn it, they still don’t understand what they have got as value and why I have to spend 2 days doing feedback due to them wont understand that they already can do something they couldn’t, five minutes ago.

For them they believe they always could do it when in fact they could not.

Not understanding that will collide with the cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias people have about learning which obviously gets in the way unless taken care off.

Unconscious installation or discovery method?

The Bandler way, teach by stories. No idea what is taught.

The discovery method by Grinder teach patterns by exposing people to patterns.

Personally I think both suck at their jobs.

While teaching is a nice interest of mine I found that if you teach distinctions like pattern detection by saying this is the pattern (demo) then continue to teach and do (practice) gain feedback from that practice and further nuance the pattern and the skill involved you get it quick.

However using the story telling we aint done yet, using the discovery same thing.

Those ways (story/discovery) takes to long.

Using what I learned about the Talent Code by David Coyle, investigated and did I found out to teach highly complex skills in a matter of minutes. Sure some research may be needed in a new setting for me, like skiing or jumping or running but once done the skill/model taught allows unprecedented enhancement.

Why did Hans change the grip again?

The new body movement would cause a steeper move so he could utilize the overlap grip to full extent. I foresee saw that and told him that he may need to change the grip from ten finger full to overlap or such. Took 2 weeks before he got that message and as he did that it felt, natural.

I expect a 10-20% speed increase during spring. (he wasn’t short before this) 25-50 yards with the same effort.

Hopefully he can bring the scoring down with that.

strategies for weight loss

If you eat more calories than you need you gain weight.
Genes do play a role but the same format applies.

Fact one, people eat to much food due to social/culture etc..Your lifestyle is likely this,

Eat 3 meals a day, breakfast, lunch and dinner, you have likely 3 short coffee breaks during the day. So that’s 6 meals a day then add any extra intake on top of those 6 meals as you stop for gas etc..

To alter the lifestyle what one does is to do it in small steps.

Add or remove some of what you eat, so if you eat to much then make sure you eat a little less or alter what you eat slightly. Over time this allows you to lower the portions.

I eat around 75% less food today than 9 years ago. (I don’t move a lot)

Fact two, make sure to include 1 to 3 day semi fasting each week.
Semi fasting means, 800 calories.

If I eat 2 eggs, bacon and a fruit and coffee with cream that’s like 400 or so calories. Thanks to the fat that allows me to go all day if I want without being hungry.

Semi fasting empty your liver and allow the body to repair itself. 800 calories is easy to do if you have a balanced food intake but if you don’t then it can be a challenge at first. Your blood sugar may go up and down the first month as you adapt.

Semi fasting 2 days a week with some slight altering of what you and how much you eat can drop your weight with half a kilo a week. Individually this varies due to what you eat today.

Fact three, if your not loosing weight then you eat to much, don’t move around, adding muscles, and are not semi fasting.

Semi fasting + a better balanced food intake depending on workload and genes and the art de vany suggestion is mediteran food plate is the option to go for, fish, nuts,vegetables etc…

  • Eat less
  • Change small things, replace food samples, lower the portion sizes over time.
  • Semi fasting 1 to 3 days a week. (Normally 1 to 2 days)
  • Adapt a mediteran food plate over time.

Regulating the blood sugar, to allow the body time to adapt takes around a month.

For myself I adapted what I eat towards that, more vegetables and less food. I still eat candy but I adapted to one small candy bar of chocolate instead of a large one.

Bu what about mentally and emotionally?

well all those reactions and responses will show up when you do the above and then you can take appropriate action.

The RBIm6 allows the individual to do changes on a present state need.

More info on Paleo and such can be found here.

Your lifestyle are likely to be depending where you grow up based upon eating to much. Islands like Okinawa are culturally different where you see 100 year old people still selling stuff at the markets. However when the younger Okinawa people adapt to fast food markets they also gain the same illnesses and diseases as the western society has.

If you did grow up on serials and milk in the morning as I did with sandwiches a cup of chocolate and today may eat some chicken, eggs, bacon and whatever else it’s a totally different morning.

I am also fond of Mexican, Indian and Thai cuisine so I have a liking for spices.

I rarely east potatoes, rice or pasta or bread. I do but its rare. Pizza is like a couple of times a year normally.

Changing habits is easy enough to be manageable and takes around a month to do.

Cracking the code to talent, done.

Hans believed that he needed to practice to do.

I said, no you don’t.

Sure its part of to keep things up maintain but practice solely wont make it. The Dan Plan the failed golf tour pro Anders Eriksson experiment yes the professor 10k hours become an expert failed his theory is shit now.

Or is it?

Here is the key point, either you can do or not.

Hans as I mentioned now and then tell me and I say ok do this like this and then within a few swings or some other he can just do it. He yesterday changed his grip again, as I told him once you start doing this (new adjustment) you may need to change the grip and he did.

Talent as the book said to be myelin neurons and the thicken of it well that’s not how you go about how to do. It’s a result of that what you did.

I cracked the how to with talent, I know what mechanisms is in play to do things. Issue is often the athlete themselves cant accept they can just do it without the practice. They believe in technique, in self confidence and whatever shit.

When you as a professional says that Mikaela shiffrin has talent and don’t understand its not and that you yourself can start doing what mikaela does if you have the knowledge and competence I have as for me that seems obvious. I can break it down, as the brain either is able to activate and do or not its then a factor of perception to access the contextual behaviors to do what’s desired. To the individual it seems, impossible due to them are not able to believe what they are doing works.

I found when working with the NLP and the Mythoself and other models that they didn’t work as they advertised them to work.

I had to develop my own models based upon evidence, measurement and actual science.

So I did.

I call it RBIm 6


do what everyone else does.

When recruited into the military we had this task to clean the room we slept in and everyone was basically harassed at this point by the military bosses to you know keep the recruits in order.

so everyone cleaned so good.

I went and cleaned a pipe behind a locker as every place I figure out needed such.

The captain came in, looked around real fast, went directly to the locker and put his hand behind it run his finger down the pipe and it came out clean.


Another time I was in a workshop and was taught something about creativity and such and our group did something totally new. Faced with a task to measure a room no one measured the height as it wasn’t part of the instruction, only our group did just that.

Most will follow what everyone else say and do and wont think outside what’s suppose to happen.

Normally when I give instructions they are to be followed as they allow for the individual to adapt their own to those.

I owned that captain in the military as I owned that workshop teacher.

I did that by understanding the rules isn’t what the rules is.

You can to.

Steve down under has a lot of work to do so his feedback been sparse and that’s fine. He however did something with RBIm 6 that isn’t doable nor possible with anything else in the world and likely the whole Universe.

Just saying.