Mike Austin throw mechanics

Mike was known to hit it long, current world record in a sanctioned PGA tournament is 540 yards at 64 years of age.

Mike taught what he did, so he thought but evidence suggest that no one was able to do what Mike did.

My modeling of Mike Austin’s motion is seen with Hans here the first in history of golf I successfully transferred the motion from one golfer to another.

In a modern golf swing your limited with your movement and that means your swing integrity of distance/accuracy gets a toll at around 270 yards and after that you be all over the place. Todays equipment allows people tour pros mainly to add more distance vs old tech. The amateur however did not benefit.

An amateur hit around 200-220 yards.
Tour pros top 100 around 290 yards.

That difference are due to a tour pro is able to swing within their swing mechanic and technique but are also causing back problems and dispersion issues.

Using a throw mechanic your using a natural body movement allowing for mass to pivot around an axis for speed.

Modern swing don’t allow that as you need to muscle it and adding a extra variable for dispersion.

Mike Austin mechanics allows

  • More distance with the same or better dispersion.
  • Better accuracy.
  • Timing is automatic and the same each time.
  • Consistency in a way you never knew was possible.
  • No back pains.
  • Leverage based pivot.
  • The tour pro can expect around a 350+ yard driving with less strain and better accuracy than previous swing.

The swing don’t make scores, its a tool to get the ball there but we have many skills in golf, putting, chipping, pitching and approach shots, course management and mental ability.

Mike Austin flew his ball over green in his 540 yard drive, didn’t make eagle or birdie. Hitting it long helps you keep more consistency but it wont do anything for your scoring. Jordan spieth for example if he shifted to this he be winning a lot more tournaments as he lost his Master title due to fighting his mechanics for 4 whole days.

With the RBIm swing system he wouldn’t had to.

It never goes wonky, you never loose the swing it always works.

Your modern swing always change tempo, timing shifts and you struggle with basic shots all the time.

Time for a change

How far can one hit the golf ball really?

I talk about swing integrity a lot which means the balance between distance and accuracy, modern swings start to spread balls at a given distance then you want to keep your swing speed in that level to keep up consistency and especially accuracy with dispersion.

The Mike Austin swing mechanics adds around a 80 yard distance increase within the same or better accuracy.

The amateur can then expect a 300+ yard driving outhitting even the best on the PGA tour.

The logic is simple, easier more efficient motion allows you to add more speed without having to do a lot of gym and work outs. True, if your stronger and tall that will add more distance obviously than a shorter weaker individual.

However, most wont believe this due to Adam Young posted an article how to hit long that he has world experts on bio mechanics telling him he is correct.

Normally I ask, do those bio mechanical experts hit the golf ball 300+ yards?
The answer will be no.
Isn’t that fun say?

To do a complex action the way people do learn golf swings today is beyond even the best pros. They cant maximize their distance and improve their accuracy as if you hit longer you can also dial down and be even more accurate.

One issue is beliefs, when Hans tells me, dude I hit my 2i the same distance I hit driver last year and I say, isn’t that a good thing then? What typically happens is that people have a specific logic to how things works in golf and other fields, that logic btw is questioned when I come and do what I do due to I am able to do magic.

Atm I am working to implement the template I developed, 6 practice sessions and I have the essence down and expect to have it all working shortly. At age 53 and 165cm tall I am not 195cm tall like Mike Austin or as tall as Hans for that matter. Still checking what I just did yesterday with a 9i at 160 steps carry in the 1c temperature means I should be able to have a 9i into summer temps in the range of 160m or more. That is also with the early implementation as I found the core throw mechanic. The field I hit during this time of year is running short. Soon I be able to go to my benchmark range where there is a valley type so one can see where the ball lands as its uphill there.

I have no idea what distances I be able to do as this is the first time I am doing this.

I can only do what I do, measure the distances hit, then as I improve and stabilize my mechanic find out what that distances are for me.

The recent swing adjustment I did for Hans added up to 3 iron clubs of increased distance.

For any tour pro that’s a distance addition they have a hard time to accept even believe in due to people as golfers believe distance increase cant be done like that without gym and a load of talent. Your stuck in what people have told you and you then created this mental model of golf in how it works and then when someone as myself comes along all that is then in jeopardy as I can do shit people don’t even know exists.

I added 50 yards in less than 2 minutes first time with Hans in his old modern swing mechanic, funny thing he hits a lot longer now with the RBIm swing btw……………………

If it was simply the swing that did the scoring it be easy.

The golf swing distance is fun for sure but once you can hit it long you then as anyone else will ask, how do I do this more consistently hitting more greens, closer to the hole etc…

If Anna Nordqvist can make 75% of Gir, but loose out with 2.5 putts worse than the best each round there is a correlation between her proximity to the hole and her making putts. She is either to far away or are misreading putts all the time. Tour pros guess when they read putts, I don’t.

So, if one asks, if I can hit a given distance let say 300 yards then a normal golf course is short. If you can hit 350 yards than any golf course that people say is long is normal even short for such a player.

The increased distance allows you an advantage.

If your able to do better with it is unknown as we see with Anna that she cant score low due to her short game isn’t good enough in spite of her hitting 75%+ GIR on average.

So you want every skill that matters as good as possible not just distance even though it does help

Anna Nordqvist lost play off on let today

Main reason, she was 6 shot worse with putting vs her opponent and she had chances but couldn’t convert them.

If putting is your weak side the  you want to bring it up to the best.
if distance from tee is your weak side you want to bring it up to the best.

Amazingly enough the RBIm system for golf allows you to do both.

When you change and then this happens

I say, change to do this putting.

You be 3 to 5 putts better.

You go play and make 4 one putts in 5 holes and are 3 under par, your mind goes kaboom!!!

That’s a positive reinforcement for something as I do as a coach, what I do works, what Sean Foley and other golf trainers do, are based on guesswork and ignorance, what I do is scientific.

Godhood stuff from the Golf God.

and yea he was 4 putts better.

I am good.

When I am right, I am right

First practice round with a whole new putting set up, so I get a text after 5 holes, 4 one putts, 3 under par. The new putting and the added feedback system was working which will will take a few rounds to get used to as changes will happen during play.

I said, well you be 3 to 5 shots better with the new putting system, he was 4 better with 26 putts.

Golf God truly.

Lydia Ko and her future

She did a few changes recently, she changed clubs, she fired Leadworse and she fired her caddie.

Leadworse didn’t listen to her, she complained about her swing and he shrugged her off, so obviously he didn’t listen to the player, as a coach that is a bad habit and she fired him.

Good job Lydia.

This season she is struggling, she is a 250 yard driver from tee, the best are around 290 so she has a 40 yard disadvantage. It means she has a 4i and ariya for example a 9i and however good you are that’s not going to work out for Lydia in the long run, she needs more distance.

I can add more to her tee shot, add some accuracy also.

Leadworse said he added 20 yards to her distance, with the A-swing, that wasn’t true.

so what should she do?

She may get back to her form, she may work on things that needs to settle.

However if she really wanted she could come and visit me, I could explain the differences, make her understand why this is better as she could feel the difference and watch the result.

2 days Lydia is all it will take to get you going.

You be having 30+ yards more from tee, you be making easier approach shots and that will with the rest of what I teach and do make you better than you ever been.

Like this

 

and this

 

So Lydia, lets talk

Putting change video

Reason I changed posture for Hans was due to what he did was not good enough as that modern putting really is a bad way to do it.

I putt as Locke/Nicklaus myself and I added the system I built to make putts all the time. When I made 8 straight one putts the people I played with asked for lessons as for me a 9 footer feels like a tap in.

Two main variables with putting, pace and line reading.

Aimpoint is a math based system but still you guess with the system or have the caddie read the line for you.

When I putted previously I was ok, I had 35 putts a lot or more. Today I played rounds where putting is so easy its pure fun. The change I went trough was to identify and define what pace is and what line reading is and map it into a model off how the brain works with performance.

Your putting on a slope 14 green like Augusta masters or a 5 slope will be the same felt putting. Putting becomes the same no matter speed of greens. Yea it’s a huge deal for anyone on tour if they could do what I teach as you go from average on tour to beat the best there.

Designing breakthroughs a tale of talents

Many trainers knows this, somehow a player becomes better, for some they take that step trough various way and then others never really take that step directly as it can be weeks, months even years or never happen so while they know about it they don’t know why some make a step forward in their development and others don’t.

I talked to Hans last night on Skype, at some point what you have done as I have has got to a point where the system itself going into a whole new level of performing.

I had clients sitting telling me the second session and asked what the hell I did as everything they had problems with for decades was gone. Having a few Swedish males write personal attacks tells me a lot about them btw and that’s not a good read for those guys btw. Those guys will have their problems and never loose them.

Anyhow I wrote a short comment to Adam Young on Facebook as I stated whatever he come to as a conclusion was wrong. Here is what Adam did, he asked me about that and he told me that article been verified by bio mechanics people several world leading ones.

My reply, still wrong.

What is interesting for me, he did ask me why I did come to the conclusion, the 4 Swedish males here never did. Many don’t understand I do know shit they don’t even know exist.

Anyhow, I await Adams response and will continue the discussion with him.

So people stop at a level then depending on who it is you may need to build them talent, functions they need to have that people don’t know what they are so how am I able to do that when you don’t know it even exist?

I did that with various models I built over the years, when I found out dyslexia was easy to deal with, real easy btw I researched what was going on and the result was that more than 80% can be free from their dyslexia in a single or a few sessions, those 20% however will need functions to be built for them before they can do it and the catmodel.eu I developed, does both.

When I used NLP and various other models to map things, I found out discrepancies so I asked around and the responses I got back told me, I am onto something here.

The result of that is RBIm6.
World leading software for the mind and body.

So when the athlete lacks the functions it may mean they know what to do but they cant do it. Once you build the function or functions for them at some point they are able to do.

Its what I do a lot, when I find someone that cant follow the instructions they are basically outside help for any profession its then what’s needed to help them overcome that hurdle and become able to do what they can do. Its not easy work btw.

Perception rules which mean’s its like a round room and your told to run to the corner. You never understand it is a round room however and then keep on running.

Perceptually that leads to frustration as the individual tend to ask, why cant I do it what is wrong with me?

When I work with dyslexics they may not understand what I am doing but they understand the result, they can read and spell and soon they can do it. I had moms and dads cry as their child suddenly could do something they never been able to do in 5 minutes. Normally it takes one or a few sessions but results is what happens.

Now I am told by professors, the best in science of dyslexia what I just did, cant be done.

So, they deny what I did due to, they didn’t check with me, they didn’t ask the kid or their parents.

So how good are those scientists?

Fucking idiots.

If your ignorant then educate yourself, no fucking excuse for being ignorant today.

If you fuck an idiot, sentence “fucking idiots” has several meanings depending on your reading skills in English btw.

To make the athlete or golfer in this case as I been working with Hans to develop functions for him that he can do to take that leap of performance has been for me a development in developing better models for performance and human life design.

It made me able to develop talent due to I researched what make it doable not just a nice observation that some people are skilled to do it but they themselves don’t know why it works, that Russian tennis lady has no clue what she does to make those tennis girls so good but she knows she has to do it in a particular way, so she is a bit better than purely guessing. So what I do is to make an observation, watch a discrepancy happen that what’s going on vs what’s done or theorized about seems to be wrong. I then investigate what’s going on and find out why things works the way they do, now I posses skills and knowledge that you don’t know exist.

I then build a model over time to produce that result I found out.

Now, John Grinder and others in NLP will say this about modeling, it’s a unconscious uptake to be able to do, then you revise that until you distill down, and let me stop there and then tell him John Grinder he is dead wrong about that with modeling.

I taught Hans to do a swing model, I couldn’t do.

So bullshit from John Grinder again as his colleague Bandler the murderer.

If you fail to realize the flat line here what’s going on and then deny the fact and evidence you start manufacturing some half assed belief about the way the world works and then perceptually are always fucking up your own reality.

Hans developed back pain with his modern swing, so I told him to change it then. He flat out refused. He was so burned with his old swing change at age 15 he never asked if there was a better way. Today he has a new swing and I then now and then ask him if he shouldn’t you know go back to what he did?

I researched what worked, so taught him things that did work, as I did slowly he changed his attitude that maybe it was possible after all to change the swing and make it better, and now it is the best.

I do elite level performance, the less than 0.001% that do things humans call impossible or often, talent.
Its what I do.

I cracked how talent works how it is built in detail, I know why a modern golf swing sucks and why the analyzing stuff will always be wrong about it. That wont mean people stop trying obviously.

I did that to aid Hans, to make him better to reach his dreams, now was that a foolish errand a fools one?

Most will never know what its like sitting across someone telling them their life is over that they are going to kill themselves and then as I did look at them due to I have skills they never knew exists and ask them stuff that changed their minds. So when I have a few Swedish males write personal attacks, about me what I can or cant do I have so much fun at their expense its beyond amazing, its real funny they think it actually means anything for anyone else in the world.

So the last couple of months I added a swing change physically for Hans, took 4 weeks and his mechanics was even better. Then I also added a mental performance update a software patch. Result was that he first had distance control problems as he started to hit irons 2 to 3 clubs longer, his 2i 40meter longer crushing it and then 2 weeks of work from my side to make him control the distance the same way he used to with his old reference.

When you make a change, expect reactions.

Next was his breakthrough as he a week ago suddenly did what I wanted him to be able to do. He now could do what’s the baseline of those elite level performance, he had started a new path towards extraordinary performances.

I let him play a week as so, then he sent me a putting video and I understood why he had putting issues as he didn’t make enough birdies, so I told him to change his set up and what he did. I also added a refinement to his mental peak performance as the baseline in his breakthrough was the first step and now it was time to add the magic of world leading performance skill.

So upcoming weekend, he is about to play a few rounds, become familiar with the new putting set up and work out what feels better for him but it has for him already felt easier to do. I asked him two question, do you do this better and he said yes both time, its little like magic.

When you used a more difficult movement to do things and then suddenly can utilize a better mechanic and then feedback in a whole new way it take some getting used to.

I taught a guy when I played BF2 how to become an ace, he become so good people constantly accused him of cheating, it was hilarious.

When you can do things people think is impossible due to talent, then you blocked out how to find out how to do it and replicate it. While human performance been a research subject for decades as people want to know how to be good at things you find yourself failing due to your told you lack talent for it.

Sure, genes do play a role for physical endurance or explosive sports, sure some have an advantage with triathlon due to some better composite body with height and muscles but that wont mean you cant reach your potential the very utter best of what you can do as you reach that it wont matter what anyone else does you know for yourself, how good you are.

I am so good there is none to match me in what I do.

A golf God.

I like to figure out how things work, its what I do. I also while doing that knew I needed better tools to do so as the ones existing didn’t allow me to do things I wanted to do.

RBIm6 is a world leading editing software for your mind and body as it allows you to build things based upon how the brain already works for you today.

in sports where genes play a minor role, like sports like golf where hand eye coordination plays a role due to the difficulty inherent in the modern swing I was lucky Hans did hurt his back as it made me go find stuff that worked better. So the back pain he developed allowed me to build a golf swing model that is the best in the world.

Failure can be a good thing.
It may lead to something totally unexpected.

Talent however is a key feature in skill where your able to focus on the task in a way that leads you to be free to play at your potential.

Hans potential he has no idea about yet but I do.

Excited here.

Locke + Nicklaus putting, pure awesomeness

The fun fact was he did win the national masters in putting 2013 with what he did before and now it be even easier if he went and competed there.

Had a really good talk on Skype tonight with him, feels good

 

Booby locke was a south African that was so good with putting the American players made a ban for him to play there. (he took all their money). Nicklaus well that guy don’t need a presentation, 18 majors.

This weekend I get some updates how this all works out.

stay tuned

and why not one more putt