Since he messaged me on Facebook and told me that the reason he banned me was because I broke etiquette and told him he didn’t know what he talked about. What I told him was it’s a dead end to research baseball for golf and implied meaning is “he could spend that time elsewhere”.
Now he could have taken steps here to do things differently like;
- He could ban me, did.
- He could have said, interesting, why would you say that? (didn’t)
- He could have said, I do my own research thanks for your input. (Didn’t)
- He could have said, a lot of other different things.
So since he wanted to be precise, using the word perfect golf swing or mechanically perfect well he is flat out wrong in his own estimate.
Here perfect means and I quote,
1. conforming absolutely to the description or definition of an ideal type: a perfect sphere; a perfectgentleman.
2.excellent or complete beyond practical or theoretical improvement: There is no perfect legal code. Theproportions of this temple are almost perfect.
3.exactly fitting the need in a certain situation or for a certain purpose: a perfect actor to play Mr.Micawber; a perfect saw for cutting out keyholes.
4.entirely without any flaws, defects, or shortcomings: a perfect apple; the perfect crime.
5.accurate, exact, or correct in every detail: a perfect copy.
6.thorough; complete; utter: perfect strangers.
7.pure or unmixed: perfect yellow.
8.unqualified; absolute: He has perfect control over his followers.
9.expert; accomplished; proficient.
10.unmitigated; out-and-out; of an extreme degree: He made a perfect fool of himself.
11.Botany .a. having all parts or members present.
a. noting an action or state brought to a close prior to some temporal point of reference, incontrast to imperfect or incomplete action.
b.designating a tense or other verb formation or construction with such meaning.
a.applied to the consonances of unison, octave, and fifth, as distinguished from those of the thirdand sixth, which are called imperfect.
b.applied to the intervals, harmonic or melodic, of an octave, fifth, and fourth in their normal form,as opposed to augmented and diminished.
14.Mathematics . (of a set) equal to its set of accumulation points.
15.Obsolete . assured or certain.
Using a word like perfect, well DJ Watts first said it with Mike Austin had the perfect motion, then went on well I am done with Austin its now a more perfect mechanically motion with this MCS.
Now in my world yes you can have a perfect experience, its entirely subjective. I wouldn’t dream about arguing about your own perfect experience its yours dude.
If one would use perfect to golf swing motion and it isn’t, well I think one should then also expect perfect, right? You can have a perfect experience swinging, so you hit it flush with any golf swing system is then that system perfect? Well if you use your experience as a criteria absolutely. I wont argue with flush.
I have people coming to tell me things also, I don’t go ballistic unless its religious stuff which I simply think is like politics they are all assholes mostly and debating what and how big hole one has is at best silly. I had guys posting comments without revealing their own name and I told them to stop doing that as I think you should post your name as if you comment it also you know mean it. If it’s a joke etc..irony use a smiley also next to it like this ;
As I said, I am not popular out there as I ask questions, tell people things and its my opinion and I am well aware its me writing this and saying things, and since I am the one doing that telling me I can stop posting because I told DJ Watts that he was way off seems at best like this science they do at bay hill funny Google, lets make a nuke and see if the earth blow up.
Can DJ hit it long? Yes never said anything else. He can add 10-15mph with what I am doing. He wont but hey at least I know why since if he did have a perfect mechanical swing motion I wouldn’t be able to add that but that is at best funny as I wouldn’t let him near what I done. I base those mph on calculations on the way muscles activate the forces of rotation and how much one would be off the pressure points. Now I know for myself its my opinion and I have no issue saying that.
Its like RBIm, it’s a system for self discovery so people ask me so what is it about….I say…self discovery…and then they go, so cool so what is it about and how do I learn about it? I say, ask questions and question things and start doing intu-flow and drills. Then what?
I don’t know its your path and journey.
Perfect in a golf swing is one thing and only one, its tempo. You can have perfect tempo and that you can do with any swing system albeit I would argue many systems be hard pressed to do one swing only and not be able to do 10 or 40 tempo swings the same in a row.
I think that many say they do research and I go, when are you then done? Many research swings one called MCS 1.0 then MCS2.0 then 3.0?
When is the research done? MCS 55.0?
One thing about science, is that there are several ways to do science, one is pragmatic (I use that) that if a method exist and someone follows that then they also have the same result. Its like those I trained in the cat model for dyslexia, they can help dyslexics to be a normal reader like you or me it’s a template a model to create that for kids that has reading or other issues like dyslexia. The model is done I know what it does and how it works it cant be proven in a science test research due to my results is off the scale there. If I take 10 dyslexics, 3 weeks later they are fine, the research is normally done over a year or such. So the control group would go 9 more months before they did the analysis, and then they would say, well it seems the dyslexics we gave you wasn’t dyslexics…after all so we need to do it again….
In golf I did 4 years of study, mainly this was slow as I been tired and ill, so I done now its defined, Larry is having a ball atm with this.
His old distances is these,
My average distances with each club:
3 wood–210 yds.
(I expect him to add 3 clubs with irons and 50 yards with driver once done)
Now, he just started to organize this reference for himself and he says he is about a club longer, nothing to write home about even at age 67. Once he is able to solidify this as his body adapts to it he will have the Mike Austin signature motion like Hans. Now I know so due to the pressure point will be the same so the body will respond in the same way.
I concluded the model was done as what I found I told Hans, then as he wanted more distance and I adjusted the down swing, he also ended up with the Mike Austin motion pattern, and many says Mike Austin had a perfect motion like DJ Watts said so maybe Hans also has one. Now once I done that – found the main criteria I do testing and a lot of it so whenever someone comes and asks me why this swing works the way it does I know what to say. This testing ensures me that it works the way it does, Hans can do it, soon Larry and soon me.
Once the template is defined, then further testing is done to remove unneeded material, that the original model might have done that has nothing to do with the result they achieved, like kinesiology, like any video or book about Mike Austin swing or any other personal trait or any description of the things you do in the swing. It’s a lot more work to do this than people understand and most of what I do and is able to do is observe and calculate things, and once I do I also tell people what I think about what they do.
I understand why Larry swings the way he did swing, and I can point the player into different things so they start to discover their own body moving trough space. Once they are able to understand how simple it can be once they done the homework. Then its obvious.
3 weeks ago Larry couldn’t do it, yesterday he could.
Time applied variation to discover feel by doing things that wont work and I call that imperfect practice as it leads you down the rabbit hole and to discovery. Larry said this in the mail today, “I feel like a little boy again, when my main job during the summer was to play. FUN!!” so seems he is having things working now.
I wont have any Mike Austin trainer coming to me and ask, how I did this or how I am able to teach Hans the same motion Mike Austin did. They still think Mike knew what he did but he just didn’t. Its like that with human beings, we assume the experts even the geniuses know what they are doing but we don’t. I done and built models since I started with NLP first crude ones and later better ones. I still don’t know how I am able to do things as I just do them and cant offer a great easy and simple model of what I do.
I can however teach a 0-4% dispersion pattern with the template I have about the golf swing, and make Hans hit it 330 yards with ease in this temperature. Now I know why it works the way it does, Larry are about to find out first hand what its like. Its why I do Skype sessions, its not possible to teach this without Skype. I can point people into that direction but without hands on work its really hard to convey the things you need to know and do. Peoples own perception gets in the way and then they cant find it.
Larry asked me a question yesterday,
he asked this, hey Rob what do I do if I am at the range and it doesn’t work?
Great question so I worked with the answer for him and that took me 90 minutes….once there he then could do it and I said, ok do that, he did a sync kinetic chain and I said superb good that’s it, now then I said try this and his old pattern his bad thing he use to do showed up and de-synced it again, and I said ok go back and do that first one again, he did a kinetic chain superb sync action again, and I said that is what you do any time you cant do things you go back to that. (template pressure point)
Now the value of that is unheard off, imagine Larry age 67 is able to do that building a new swing in weeks.
I know people say you know Rob I think you do great things and I say thank you but why would you argue with others or tell your opinion and I say the same thing I told Patrick as I told Bodil and as I told every student and such I had, its my way. Its what I do.
Many think I am a bad guy, no I am the RBImGuy I say, and even people in the Mythosphere think I was a bad guy until they met me, its what words do, online stuff does to people form subjective assumptions that isn’t true but people think they are. However if you use the the word perfect to a motion obviously main criteria for me would be, prove that it is perfect and it cant be its not possible. Tempo can be perfect but that is different so is your experience of what you do.
So here what DJ himself says, “Explaining a little about the MPS or mechanically perfect swing motion as innovated by the late great Mike Austin years ago.” end quote.
He DJ Watts is not correct.
Hans have a better Mike Austin mechanical correct motion. Last I checked Hans was trained by me not DJ Watts.
If people want to buy the argument its perfect when DJ Watts says so and I just don’t accept that statement or argument as Hans is better by far.
Personally I don’t think that Austin had a “perfect” mechanical motion. Its by far one of the easier system to do while hitting it long. One must keep that also in mind that Mike did hit it long, and many systems can hit it accurately but not long. So while I choose a model I knew one thing I wanted to capture the Mike Austin swing he himself was doing but failed to teach. That is accomplished.
I guess DJ still is researching the baseball stuff?
We want to see things the way we want to see them, its inherent in our mind and perception and you cant get out of it unless you do some serious work on yourself with technologies like RBIm.
I told Hans about the back swing definition, that its about creating space in the down swing and he was like, yea that make sense. Once defined its obvious why you do things. I then said do only this and he was like only this??
Yes, how do you hit the ball then? superb he said. Ok I said, what else has happen as I see those things is a better back swing now, a tighter grouping a loosen up of muscle groups a better kinetic chain all that trough the template I am using of the motion Mike Austin himself did do, not taught.
I think unless your totally blind can watch Mike swing and then watch Hans and go, same.
There are minor differences one is the hand action Mike did as he added more speed in the down swing sequence which also didn’t help his accuracy and one reason Mike couldn’t play golf as well he did swing.
So for me, DJ Watts claims Mike Austin did a perfect mechanical action and then he goes on saying it’s a mechanical perfect? motion when it don’t match and that I simply think is blatantly wrong and is confusing the viewers and readers as either its perfect and then it should match Mike and Hans or it isn’t and its just a mechanical motion which I would agree upon, just not perfect.
I am looking forward the trackman numbers for Hans. I do hope he is able to do that this weekend.
Since I broke the etiquette and its a bad thing to DJ Watts I guess it means well it doesn’t mean anything more than people have some law they think is the law for everyone else also and I simply state, I disagree. Whenever you see that pattern that people use their own beliefs to make you agree upon them and that they are right, I don’t pay well when I take note of those.
I don’t agree upon things Steve does, still I wouldn’t ever dream about telling him those, its his stuff not mine. Same with Larry, same with Hans as I let people have their own fucking meaning of life until it bothers me and so I say then if it does. I had clients over the years that was nuts and I been in the present of many wacky people and one thing I know about those there is always a a rule that has to be the way it suppose to be.
Mine are, never post anonymously here or about religious stuff or spam some shit that is about Viagra or such.
Post a question I write what I think. Sometimes I don’t know and I tell you. Sometimes I go do some research and then tell you what I think. I love questions.
I am a bit autistic so I guess I shouldn’t tell people to become better and do better work.
Its what I do as the RBIm Guy, I make people better at what they do and that is also why doing things which for me make no sense then I do say so.
I don’t spend much time arguing over stuff I find boring.
But since DJ Watts wanted to be precise why he banned me I think he can do himself a service and remove the word perfect from anything he is doing with the golf swing until he is able to do what Mike did and Hans are doing as far I can tell he is way off base and since it isn’t then perfect well I know what I call that here.
My fucking opinion again about the same shit as before.
Irishman for example as a sidenote at the end, told me I should write more proper English so I could get Tiger Woods you know to swing better one day if he visited my website and he had a good intention sure but my website and as far I write things my way. He still isn’t banned for telling me that and still welcome to post questions about stuff.
I don’t spend time with shit, I get bored fast, and if someone isn’t listening then I go drink coffee until they are ready. This is what I do, I swear about dicks and pussy girls have with boobs here as I think you need a blow job when you come home from work, I got a black sense of humor and thinks Matrix is a movie that blows your mind and dick at the same time and I am seldom smiling and not saying what I think unless its just such a neighbor hood that wouldn’t be good for that.
Other than that I am a good funny guy that don’t have time for shit like this.
I do hope I was precise enough here.