If you don’t know then you don’t know.
I assume that when someone like Joseph Riggio writes he knew and everyone else didn’t he also could answer my question in the workshop he taught, explicitly, he couldn’t as he didn’t know.
He still don’t.
Am I naïve then for thinking like that?
If we want people to believe in fairytales like Bandler and Grinder told us then I am sure people want to continue believe in them. Its comforting.
I did study the modeling process itself for 20 years and its just recently I can say I have come close to define and improve upon it. In some aspect I know it’s the simplest technology in modeling which also makes it the most complex as to make it simple one have to reduce it all into a single equation.
I don’t do well with guesswork and theory. I had enough of that with NLP and psychology and the rest. Doing for example hypnosis and so called somatic work tougher is a bad idea as its done with Mythoself the way the human brain works can make you nuts going trough such a workshop and it did happen to one of my students. I had to save their marriage.
It seems I am doing a huge clean up of NLP from Bandlers lies and the way a NLP Trainer can analyze what obviously didn’t work when Bandler did his phobia intervention so how can a well renown NLP Trainer miss that obvious fact?
Its not his fault, years ago I might done the same.
Today I don’t as I know better and why.
For example when I work with clients I always ask them, why questions.
I had this girl, a year or two in therapy, she came in with self personality issues, weak self image etc..so I look at her and ask, so why do you think this did happen? She said, well I think its due to my twin sister…. So that was the first 30 seconds and then I knew what to do. She was fine after the first session vs loong therapy previously.
Some people here in Sweden one guy a NLP Trainer under John Grinder compared me to Bandler. Some other guy called me a genius and then some other guy called me an asshole.
NLP tells you to ask, how do you know? and that stupid. If the client would know, then they would tell you.
Now and then I think the guys developing NLP don’t actually understand the brain.
It seems for me my observation is way more accurate about NLP, Bandler, Grinder, Mythoself than I know you don’t statement from Joseph Riggio.
I was told by Oli that well at least you tell it the way it is, yea I know, if I don’t know then I don’t know, making up shit I leave to Bandler, Grinder and the rest as I don’t like to make up shit and then teach it without knowing its shit.
Modeling is a way to analyze and replicate other peoples result we classify as better than what the average Joe does in any given field, it means baking a cinnamon cookie or raising a child or picking the best dress for the evening or creating a rocket for space.
I done some modeling of Mike Austin. He did hit a golf ball a long way, then he tried to teach it and failed. His students and none of them was able to do, what Mike did do. They were able to hit the ball longer yes but replicate the original model Mike Austin? No.
He did it then he used kinesiology to study what he did and then teach but here is the thing, his own mind got in the way of what he did. If he was alive I could teach him what he failed to teach others about what he himself did do.
Its due to modeling skills and one goal and aim I have is to explain it in a way that make sense as I evolved modeling into some understanding why NLP went the wrong way which means John Grinder and Richard Bandler, David Gordon and the rest.
For example Connirae Andreas and Tamara did model Roye Fraser with Steve Andreas, what they come up with was Core transformation. It’s a book and technology. Its also a poor attempt to model down what Roye did do which he himself could not explain what he did do and nor can Joseph Riggio.
Human beings need concepts they understand but to get there with all this ideals that exists today with unconscious mind (Guesswork) and misnomers like “change” or such will lead you astray.
If you study a child you find they shift their attention every 8 or 10 seconds and I did demonstrate that with Hans daughter and told him, check this out and pointed out to him when she did shift. I learned that from Bruce Lee.
He was a martial artists that redefined the martial arts fully.
You can trace back every free or open ended art today like Gracie brothers jiu-jitsu to what Bruce lee did and the work he did carried out by Dan Inosanto for generations to come to be able to relive themselves from the classical mess.
Why was Bruce able to do so?
He understood what he was taught was style, wing chun and in simple terms, sucked.
He understood he was taught style so he then researched. Over time he created something else a concept called JKD which teaches you the essence of fighting to analyze what’s there and to add and absorb what you are fit for and then discard the rest.
That’s modeling for sure adapted for the individual to find their fighting style without style.
RBIm is done the same way it’s a system, a generic system a model that you can and will adapt your way as your understanding of the mechanics in the system will depend on so many variables. The JKD user might look like a boxer but he or she then will be using the JKD concept to suit their style and someone else might look like a Thai boxer and that wont matter as they be both using the same concept to do that.
RBIm is a R-Evolution, its inherent in my work as I don’t look and check for guesswork or theory but actual measured stuff one can verify. Doing that allowed me to create a system of thought a concept to organize around and as I redefine and distill down I can explain and teach the system better and better. Since November I totally redecorated the teachings fully.
RBim will allow true freedom for the individual
while allowing for structure at the same time.
We work with a phobia the same way we work with anxiety or trauma or life design of happiness or establishing new habits. RBIm allows you to learn one system one concept and then can do everything.
Why can that work when NLP and NHR, DHE, New Code NLP, 3D Mind, meta-states, Mythoself etc..all seem so different then?
Its due to them don’t understand the brain and in sequence, reality.
I understand the brain rather well know the reality is still a bit sketchy and if I get there I find out.
The idea behind the membership RBIm website is this, to create a unheard collection of skills and approaches that works to create the life you want trough edcuation. To add your innovation to that along the way so you can contribute your ideas and experiences within the format.
RBIm isn’t a change technology or transformation or mastery or whatever else.
Its education 2 innovate
I could create students that was taught the model and applied it that be rote mode for most to do but me cant do that as I am not built that way as to create innovation to evolve we need better tools to do modeling and understand that so we can create thinking hats the so called RBIm templates and apply those so we can learn to think the way people are thinking out there right now and done previously in history to create airplanes, space rockets, radio, television and even nuclear power.
Its like anything else, when enough people have such knowledge then the R-Evolution happens by itself.
I evolve, so does RBIm, and if I write a book it seems old when I am done as I am already using the concept and principles the mechanics to create and innovate upon them again.
Modeling can be a science as we can do things differently without the burden of the unconscious mind.
The RBIm modeling is done differently, the templates are models that are used differently than models from NLP and from Bandler and Grinder.
With RBIm we have a generic approach that don’t create a specific result but your able to innovate new stuff as we can combine for example several approaches used by people and then create something new. The RBIm templates is the next logical step for me to study and decorate once the website is up and running with membership.
I have no idea if people want this type of education or want to do this kind of work but I will find out. I have had several people coming from various backgrounds here that simply put are looking for what works for them.
Here you can educate yourself and build what works for you.
Next generation modeling